search for: 6kbit

...x recording. It managed this at a respectable pace for complexity 10: Skipping chunk of type "LIST", length 76 Encoding using libopus 0.9.14 (audio) ----------------------------------------------------- Input: 44.1kHz 1 channel Output: 1 channel (1 uncoupled) 20ms packets, 6kbit/sec VBR Preskip: 356 Encoding complete ----------------------------------------------------- Encoded: 2 minutes and 0.02 seconds Runtime: 50.9 seconds (2.358x realtime) Wrote: 111194 bytes, 6001 packets, 123 pages Bitrate: 6.78414kbit/s (without overhead) Rate rang...

...is something else set. Do not want to claim a regression when it may be my own fault. Thanks for your response. Best Regards, Stuart Marsden On 17 December 2013 11:04, Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com>wrote: > Hi Stuart, > > > > you are compressing it at 6kbit/s. Then, then SILK mode is probability > used and the Silk mode is much faster than CELT. Do you also some figures > at 64kbit/s? > > > > It is strange that Opus 1.1 got slower in the Silk mode ? may the > speech/voice selection adds some overhead. I would be interested in seei...

Hi i have found a problem related with tbf and the latency that the tbf calculates.. I have used the following parameters for burst and limit burst 100Kbit limit 500Kbit lat81.8ms burst 6Kbit limit 6Kbit lat 0us burst 200Kbit limit 100Kbit lat 4294.9s As u can see in the 3rd column the latency for 100Kbit burst and 500Kbit limit is 81.8ms but for 200Kbit and limit 100Kbit is 4294.9s!!! How could be possible??? I want to find a way to caclulate the latency for a packet entering m...

Hi Stuart, you are compressing it at 6kbit/s. Then, then SILK mode is probability used and the Silk mode is much faster than CELT. Do you also some figures at 64kbit/s? It is strange that Opus 1.1 got slower in the Silk mode - may the speech/voice selection adds some overhead. I would be interested in seeing the performance of the 64 kb...

...rds, >> >> >> >> Stuart Marsden >> >> >> >> >> >> On 17 December 2013 11:04, Christian Hoene <christian.hoene at symonics.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Stuart, >> >> >> >> you are compressing it at 6kbit/s. Then, then SILK mode is probability >> used and the Silk mode is much faster than CELT. Do you also some figures >> at 64kbit/s? >> >> >> >> It is strange that Opus 1.1 got slower in the Silk mode ? may the >> speech/voice selection adds some overhead. I...

...mit upload per client whatever method I used. Please HELP ME LIMIT THE UPLOADS ON A PER CLIENT BASIS. This is my Setup : INTERNET ---- eth0 DEBIAN eth1 -- LAN SWITCH ---40 PCS The working CBQ script that I use to limit download for a certain PC is: DEVICE=eth1,100Mbit,10Mbit RATE=64Kbit WEIGHT=6Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=192.168.1.166 The UPLOAD SCRIPT that I use to limit UPLOADS is "NOT WORKING" !! Upload Script "NOT WORKING" # -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=64Kbit WEIGHT=6Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=192.168.1.166, #...

...sciplines for plis230 network... tc class add dev br0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbit ceil 512kbit #Loading queue disciplines for pmad048 network... tc class add dev br0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 30kbit ceil 30kbit #server queue tc class add dev br0 parent 1:20 classid 1:21 htb rate 6kbit ceil 30kbit tc filter add dev br0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip dst 57.227.233.3 flowid 1:21 tc qdisc add dev br0 parent 1:21 handle 200:0 sfq perturb 10 #non server queue tc class add dev br0 parent 1:20 classid 1:22 htb rate 24kbit ceil 30kbit #www queue tc class add dev br0 parent...

...d 2.4.21 applied this: #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU in file linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h bevore compiled the kernel (described on http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/40.html) bandwitch on eth0: 128kbit The most simple configuration - 122kbit guaranted for WWW (sport 80) and 6kbit for the rest. tc qdisc del root dev eth0 tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb default 3 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 128kbit ceil 128kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 122kbit ceil 128kbit quantum 30500 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 class...

...lass add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 64kbit ceil 64kbit burst 5k tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 57kbit ceil 64kbit burst 5k tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 51kbit ceil 64kbit burst 5k tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:40 htb rate 6kbit burst 0 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:20 handle 20: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:30 handle 30: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:40 handle 40: sfq perturb 10 Notes: * No errors from the tc utility * All filte...

Hi folks. For quite a while, I tried to use linux (cbq and htb) to control bandwidth in order to replace a cisco equipment used to play this role on our network. After trying here and there, with a bunch of different distros, different versions, different compilations, ... the closest I could get was as follows: (using htb.init and cbq.init) Desired BW ==> Achieved BW 128k ==> 404.78

About the cbq.init. Four machines which traffic to limit in same LAN. Is the samething if I put limiting rules to four different files or all to the same file? Like: DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=64Kbit WEIGHT=6Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=192.168.0.5 RULE=192.168.0.6 RULE=192.168.0.7 RULE=192.168.0.8 OR four equal files with different IPs, Ids and no PARENT rule? What style of ID numbering you use if there is many conf files? I read about htb.init problem here: "<snip> LEAF=sfq RULE=192.168.1.[1..6] The prob...

...h0 parent 1:998 handle 1998: sfq perturb 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:998 classid 1:997 htb rate 1000kbit ceil 1000kbit prio 0 quantum 15140 tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip sport 3000 0xffff flowid 1:997 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:999 htb rate 6kbit ceil 64kbit prio 0 quantum 1514 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:999 handle 1999: sfq perturb 10 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 24kbit ceil 64kbit prio 0 quantum 1514 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:3 htb rate 24kbit ceil 24kbit prio 0 quantum 1514 tc class add dev e...

...edit so that the script handles the requests on a per computer basis instead of a network as a whole. Thx for any suggestions #Download Section tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 11: cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt \ 1000 mpu 64 tc class add dev eth2 parent 11:0 classid 11:1 cbq rate 64Kbit \ weight 6Kbit allot 1514 prio 1 avpkt 1000 bounded tc filter add dev eth2 parent 11:0 protocol ip handle 4 fw flowid 11:1 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -s ! 192.168.128.16/28 -d \ 192.168.128.16/28 -j MARK --set-mark 4 #Upload Section tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt \ 10...

...edit so that the script handles the requests on a per computer basis instead of a network as a whole. Thx for any suggestions #Download Section tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 11: cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt \ 1000 mpu 64 tc class add dev eth2 parent 11:0 classid 11:1 cbq rate 64Kbit \ weight 6Kbit allot 1514 prio 1 avpkt 1000 bounded tc filter add dev eth2 parent 11:0 protocol ip handle 4 fw flowid 11:1 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -s ! 192.168.128.16/28 -d \ 192.168.128.16/28 -j MARK --set-mark 4 #Upload Section tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt \ 10...

...th0,100Mbit,10Mbit RATE=100Mbit WEIGHT=10Mbit PRIO=1 BOUNDED=no RULE=192.168.6.0/24,192.168.5.0/24 RULE=192.168.5.0/24,192.168.6.0/24 root@mail:/etc/cbq# cat cbq-128.ourDept-internet-total DEVICE=eth0,100Mbit,10Mbit RATE=100Mbit WEIGHT=10Mbit LEAF=none PRIO=6 BOUNDED=yes TIME=20:00-06:00;160Kbit/16Kbit root@mail:/etc/cbq# cat cbq-129.DSD-P2P DEVICE=eth0,100Mbit,10Mbit RATE=120Kbit WEIGHT=12Kbit PRIO=8 PARENT=128 BOUNDED=yes RULE=:1214 RULE=,:1214 RULE=:6346 RULE=,:6346 TIME=20:00-06:00;60Kbit/6Kbit root@mail:/etc/cbq# cat cbq-130.ourDept-internet DEVICE=eth0,100Mbit,10Mbit RATE=100...

I wanted to roughly benchmark how the different version of libopus performed at each complexity level for a 6kbit/s output opus file. This was conducted on a Raspberry Pi so it is a constant hardware platform. This was done on an early Pi so only 256MB RAM but it was never used up so should not make a difference. I compiled the three final versions of each major release of libopus so that was 0.9.14, 1.0.3 &a...

...flowid 1: A4f > > These filters do not work for traffic to or from the router. > In the old versions of these filters work iproute > > > b) squid (only egrees) > In the case of traffic from squid filter captures traffic diversion, but the interface is killed ifb movement (2-6kbit) > > Traffic is routed to squid with iptables. After downloading the redirect to squid qos works well. > I noticed that this problem occurs on the cards gigabyte (for Intel 100Pro is ok) > > c) the police action + action mirror > This problem was resolved for the 2010 version of...

...egory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> Message-ID: <CALPi7JckeXBzKuE2M4iG5iH91M=joj6uNO=RsTVb+qt04mKsQw at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I wanted to roughly benchmark how the different version of libopus performed at each complexity level for a 6kbit/s output opus file. This was conducted on a Raspberry Pi so it is a constant hardware platform. This was done on an early Pi so only 256MB RAM but it was never used up so should not make a difference. I compiled the three final versions of each major release of libopus so that was 0.9.14, 1.0.3 &a...

...add dev ppp0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 512Kbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq bandwidth 512Kbit rate 512Kbit weight 50Kbit prio 8 allot 1514 cell 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 cbq bandwidth 512Kbit rate 64Kbit weight 6Kbit prio 8 allot 1514 cell 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 bounded isolated tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:10 tbf rate 64Kbit buffer 10Kb/8 limit 15Kb mtu 1500 tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src <the SRC IP of my VPN> flowid 1:10 Okay, so, with this, packets comm...

...Message-ID: >> <CALPi7JckeXBzKuE2M4iG5iH91M=joj6uNO=RsTVb+qt04mKsQw at mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> I wanted to roughly benchmark how the different version of libopus >> performed at each complexity level for a 6kbit/s output opus file. This >> was >> conducted on a Raspberry Pi so it is a constant hardware platform. This >> was >> done on an early Pi so only 256MB RAM but it was never used up so should >> not make a difference. >> >> I compiled the three final versions...