Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "6fvh".
Did you mean:
6fh
2015 Apr 18
0
Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
...net/
PGP public key available on web site.
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlUx4A4ACgkQVKC1jlbQAQeXkwCg3PV/RHRH0YmJexnhT2UipZ2j
NPsAnA1CDtilemMOagzjA5nPV+8/vW+k
=6FVH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2015 Apr 18
2
Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 23:45:42 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> So, I am assuming that without --itemize-changes you couldn't tell the
> difference between "I am transferring a file" and "I am fixing the
> timestamp on a file".
>
> Even if I am right, you are probably still mis-using --checksum. When