Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "6f4b961e".
2010 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
On Sep 7, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 7 September 2010 16:49, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote:
>> Your recent changes mentioned below would change correctness of debug info,
>> but it would unlikely to impact structure of DWARF generated. And somehow,
>> this structure is invalid in your case.
>
> I was hoping for a quick-fix on the
2010 Sep 07
2
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
On 7 September 2010 16:49, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote:
> Your recent changes mentioned below would change correctness of debug info,
> but it would unlikely to impact structure of DWARF generated. And somehow,
> this structure is invalid in your case.
I was hoping for a quick-fix on the assumptions of DwarfDebug about
Subprograms' MDNodes, but it might be
2010 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] More DIFactory questions - still stumped
...ed
> on IR mercilessly and optimizer must not be influenced by presence of
> encoded debug info in IR.
>
> -
> Devang
>
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20101010/6f4b961e/attachment.html>