search for: 6ef70f1

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "6ef70f1".

Did you mean: 6e3f74f1
2015 May 12
4
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/7] virtio: relax feature check
...even if they are still not implemented. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > index d95f8b6..6ef70f1 100644 > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > @@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static inline void virtio_clear_feature(uint32_t *features, unsigned int fbit) > > static inline bool __virtio_has_feature(uint32_t features, unsigned int fbit) > { > - asse...
2015 May 12
4
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/7] virtio: relax feature check
...even if they are still not implemented. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > index d95f8b6..6ef70f1 100644 > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > @@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static inline void virtio_clear_feature(uint32_t *features, unsigned int fbit) > > static inline bool __virtio_has_feature(uint32_t features, unsigned int fbit) > { > - asse...
2015 May 12
2
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/7] virtio: relax feature check
...ff-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > --- > > > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 - > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > index d95f8b6..6ef70f1 100644 > > > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > @@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static inline void virtio_clear_feature(uint32_t *features, unsigned int fbit) > > > > > > static inline bool __virtio_has_feature(uint32_t f...
2015 May 12
2
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/7] virtio: relax feature check
...ff-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > --- > > > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 - > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > index d95f8b6..6ef70f1 100644 > > > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > @@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static inline void virtio_clear_feature(uint32_t *features, unsigned int fbit) > > > > > > static inline bool __virtio_has_feature(uint32_t f...
2015 May 12
1
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/7] virtio: relax feature check
...t; > > > --- > > > > > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 - > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > > > index d95f8b6..6ef70f1 100644 > > > > > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > > > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > > > @@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static inline void virtio_clear_feature(uint32_t *features, unsigned int fbit) > > > > > > > > > >...
2015 May 12
1
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/7] virtio: relax feature check
...t; > > > --- > > > > > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 - > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > > > index d95f8b6..6ef70f1 100644 > > > > > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > > > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > > > @@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static inline void virtio_clear_feature(uint32_t *features, unsigned int fbit) > > > > > > > > > >...
2015 May 06
0
[PATCH RFC 1/7] virtio: relax feature check
...64-bit features like VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1, even if they are still not implemented. Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz at linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h index d95f8b6..6ef70f1 100644 --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h @@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static inline void virtio_clear_feature(uint32_t *features, unsigned int fbit) static inline bool __virtio_has_feature(uint32_t features, unsigned int fbit) { - assert(fbit < 32); return !!(f...
2015 May 12
0
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/7] virtio: relax feature check
...> > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > --- > > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > index d95f8b6..6ef70f1 100644 > > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > @@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static inline void virtio_clear_feature(uint32_t *features, unsigned int fbit) > > > > static inline bool __virtio_has_feature(uint32_t features, unsigned int fbi...
2015 May 12
0
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/7] virtio: relax feature check
...linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > --- > > > > include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 - > > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > > index d95f8b6..6ef70f1 100644 > > > > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > > > @@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ static inline void virtio_clear_feature(uint32_t *features, unsigned int fbit) > > > > > > > > static inline bool __virt...
2015 May 06
9
[PATCH RFC 0/7] vhost: cross-endian support (vhost-net only)
Hi, This series allows QEMU to use vhost with legacy virtio devices when host and target don't have the same endianness. Only network devices are covered for the moment. I had already posted a series some monthes ago but it never got reviewed. Moreover, the underlying kernel support was entirely re-written and is still waiting to be applied by Michael. I hence post as RFC. The corresponding
2015 May 06
9
[PATCH RFC 0/7] vhost: cross-endian support (vhost-net only)
Hi, This series allows QEMU to use vhost with legacy virtio devices when host and target don't have the same endianness. Only network devices are covered for the moment. I had already posted a series some monthes ago but it never got reviewed. Moreover, the underlying kernel support was entirely re-written and is still waiting to be applied by Michael. I hence post as RFC. The corresponding