search for: 6e4f347

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "6e4f347".

Did you mean: 643347
2016 Jun 30
2
[PATCH net-next V3 5/6] net: introduce NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN
..._UDP_TUNNEL_PUSH_INFO 0x001C > +#define NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN 0x001E > > int register_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > int unregister_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c > index 7a0b616..6e4f347 100644 > --- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c > +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c > @@ -322,7 +322,20 @@ NETDEVICE_SHOW_RW(flags, fmt_hex); > > static int change_tx_queue_len(struct net_device *dev, unsigned long new_len) > { > - dev->tx_queue_len = new_len; > + int res, orig_len = de...
2016 Jun 30
2
[PATCH net-next V3 5/6] net: introduce NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN
..._UDP_TUNNEL_PUSH_INFO 0x001C > +#define NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN 0x001E > > int register_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > int unregister_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c > index 7a0b616..6e4f347 100644 > --- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c > +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c > @@ -322,7 +322,20 @@ NETDEVICE_SHOW_RW(flags, fmt_hex); > > static int change_tx_queue_len(struct net_device *dev, unsigned long new_len) > { > - dev->tx_queue_len = new_len; > + int res, orig_len = de...
2016 Jun 30
1
[PATCH net-next V3 5/6] net: introduce NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN
...; +#define NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN 0x001E >>> int register_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); >>> int unregister_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); >>> diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c >>> index 7a0b616..6e4f347 100644 >>> --- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c >>> +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c >>> @@ -322,7 +322,20 @@ NETDEVICE_SHOW_RW(flags, fmt_hex); >>> static int change_tx_queue_len(struct net_device *dev, unsigned >>> long new_len) >>> { >>> -...
2016 Jun 30
1
[PATCH net-next V3 5/6] net: introduce NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN
...; +#define NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN 0x001E >>> int register_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); >>> int unregister_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); >>> diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c >>> index 7a0b616..6e4f347 100644 >>> --- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c >>> +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c >>> @@ -322,7 +322,20 @@ NETDEVICE_SHOW_RW(flags, fmt_hex); >>> static int change_tx_queue_len(struct net_device *dev, unsigned >>> long new_len) >>> { >>> -...
2016 Jun 30
0
[PATCH net-next V3 5/6] net: introduce NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN
...C >> +#define NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN 0x001E >> >> int register_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); >> int unregister_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); >> diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c >> index 7a0b616..6e4f347 100644 >> --- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c >> +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c >> @@ -322,7 +322,20 @@ NETDEVICE_SHOW_RW(flags, fmt_hex); >> >> static int change_tx_queue_len(struct net_device *dev, unsigned long new_len) >> { >> - dev->tx_queue_len = new_len...
2016 Jun 30
0
[PATCH net-next V3 5/6] net: introduce NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN
...ERSTATE 0x001B #define NETDEV_UDP_TUNNEL_PUSH_INFO 0x001C +#define NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN 0x001E int register_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); int unregister_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c index 7a0b616..6e4f347 100644 --- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c @@ -322,7 +322,20 @@ NETDEVICE_SHOW_RW(flags, fmt_hex); static int change_tx_queue_len(struct net_device *dev, unsigned long new_len) { - dev->tx_queue_len = new_len; + int res, orig_len = dev->tx_queue_len; + + if (new_len != o...
2016 Jun 30
0
[PATCH net-next V4 5/6] net: introduce NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN
...ERSTATE 0x001B #define NETDEV_UDP_TUNNEL_PUSH_INFO 0x001C +#define NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN 0x001E int register_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); int unregister_netdevice_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c index 7a0b616..6e4f347 100644 --- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c @@ -322,7 +322,20 @@ NETDEVICE_SHOW_RW(flags, fmt_hex); static int change_tx_queue_len(struct net_device *dev, unsigned long new_len) { - dev->tx_queue_len = new_len; + int res, orig_len = dev->tx_queue_len; + + if (new_len != o...
2016 Jun 30
9
[PATCH net-next V3 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the
2016 Jun 30
9
[PATCH net-next V3 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the
2016 Jun 30
10
[PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the
2016 Jun 30
10
[PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the