Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "6e390f6e".
Did you mean:
6e390a6
2015 Apr 09
1
[dpdk-dev] [snabb-devel] Re: memory barriers in virtq.lua?
...ag 3.guest checks the used.
> 4. host update used.
> Is this your case?
>
Yep, that is exactly the case I mean.
Cheers,
-Luke
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20150409/6e390f6e/attachment.html>
2015 Apr 09
1
[dpdk-dev] [snabb-devel] Re: memory barriers in virtq.lua?
...ag 3.guest checks the used.
> 4. host update used.
> Is this your case?
>
Yep, that is exactly the case I mean.
Cheers,
-Luke
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20150409/6e390f6e/attachment.html>
2015 Apr 07
4
[snabb-devel] Re: memory barriers in virtq.lua?
Hi Michael,
I'm writing to follow up the previous discussion about memory barriers in
virtio-net device implementations, and Cc'ing the DPDK list because I
believe this is relevant to them too.
First, thanks again for getting in touch and reviewing our code.
I have now found a missed case where we *do* require a hardware memory
barrier on x86 in our vhost/virtio-net device. That is when
2015 Apr 07
4
[snabb-devel] Re: memory barriers in virtq.lua?
Hi Michael,
I'm writing to follow up the previous discussion about memory barriers in
virtio-net device implementations, and Cc'ing the DPDK list because I
believe this is relevant to them too.
First, thanks again for getting in touch and reviewing our code.
I have now found a missed case where we *do* require a hardware memory
barrier on x86 in our vhost/virtio-net device. That is when