Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "6e1".
Did you mean:
631
2004 Dec 17
0
behaviour of BIC and AICc code
...(n-K-1))
Is this behaviour expected? Or is the coding off? I could find no reference to this
problem in the archives here, nor at S-news.
Cheers,
Joe
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Joseph J. Nocera
Ph.D. Candidate
Biology Department - Univ. New Brunswick
Fredericton, NB
Canada E3B 6E1
tel: (902) 679-5733
2005 Feb 07
3
problem with logistic regression
Hi,
we try to do a logistic regression with the function glm.
But we notice that this function don't give the same results as the SAS proc
catmod (differents estimate given).
We try to change the contrast on R system with:
> options(contrasts=c(unordered="contr.SAS",ordered="contr.poly"))
We also try with brlr and logistf functions.
Unfortunately, the estimate
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...b: 70 6f jo 6ec <__FUNCTION__.22568+0x4>
> + 67b: 70 6f jo 6ec <__FUNCTION__.22481+0x4>
> 67d: 6e outsb %ds:(%esi),(%dx)
> 67e: 65 6e outsb %gs:(%esi),(%dx)
> - 680: 74 5f je 6e1 <__FUNCTION__.22492+0x9>
> + 680: 74 5f je 6e1 <__FUNCTION__.22405+0x9>
> 682: 61 popa
> 683: 6c insb (%dx),%es:(%edi)
> 684: 69 61 73 65 73 00 00 imul $0x7365,0x73(%ecx),%esp
> ...
>
> -000006a0...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the