Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "6da".
Did you mean:
6d
2013 Nov 09
3
usb ups on openindiana
...le usb-input n /devices/pci at 0,0/pci103c,1609 at 12:5
# prtconf -v | ggrep -B20 -A20 OMRON | egrep "value='(NAME|usb)"
value='NAME= ugen0 Power' + '0=USB D3 State' +
'3=USB D0 State'
value='usb6da,3.0' + 'usb6da,3' +
'usbif6da,class3.0.0' + 'usbif6da,class3.0' + 'usbif6da,class3' +
'usbif,class3.0.0' + 'usbif,class3.0' + 'usbif,class3' + 'usb,device'
So this UPS has VendorID 06DA, ProductID 0003.
# rem_drv ugen
# add_drv...
2013 Nov 09
0
usb ups on openindiana
...cfg str descr>
> unavailable usb-input n /devices/pci at 0,0/pci103c,1609 at 12:5
>
> # prtconf -v | ggrep -B20 -A20 OMRON | egrep "value='(NAME|usb)"
>
> value='NAME= ugen0 Power' + '0=USB D3 State' +
> '3=USB D0 State'
> value='usb6da,3.0' + 'usb6da,3' +
> 'usbif6da,class3.0.0' + 'usbif6da,class3.0' + 'usbif6da,class3' +
> 'usbif,class3.0.0' + 'usbif,class3.0' + 'usbif,class3' + 'usb,device'
>
>
> So this UPS has VendorID 06DA, ProductID 0003.
>...
2019 May 18
2
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 2/7] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver
...ftirq=1055108/1055110 fqs=0
[ 2504.179802] rcu: 3-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=1d6/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=1046798/1046802 fqs=0
[ 2504.181215] rcu: 4-...!: (2 ticks this GP) idle=522/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=1249063/1249064 fqs=0
[ 2504.182625] rcu: 5-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=6da/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=1131036/1131047 fqs=0
[ 2504.183955] (detected by 3, t=0 jiffies, g=1232529, q=1370)
[ 2504.184762] Sending NMI from CPU 3 to CPUs 0:
[ 2504.186400] NMI backtrace for cpu 0
[ 2504.186401] CPU: 0 PID: 6670 Comm: 464 Not tainted 5.1.0+ #1
[ 2504.186401] Hardware name: C...
2019 May 18
2
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 2/7] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver
...ftirq=1055108/1055110 fqs=0
[ 2504.179802] rcu: 3-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=1d6/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=1046798/1046802 fqs=0
[ 2504.181215] rcu: 4-...!: (2 ticks this GP) idle=522/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=1249063/1249064 fqs=0
[ 2504.182625] rcu: 5-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=6da/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=1131036/1131047 fqs=0
[ 2504.183955] (detected by 3, t=0 jiffies, g=1232529, q=1370)
[ 2504.184762] Sending NMI from CPU 3 to CPUs 0:
[ 2504.186400] NMI backtrace for cpu 0
[ 2504.186401] CPU: 0 PID: 6670 Comm: 464 Not tainted 5.1.0+ #1
[ 2504.186401] Hardware name: C...
2019 May 20
0
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 2/7] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver
...fqs=0
> [ 2504.179802] rcu: 3-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=1d6/1/0x4000000000000002
> softirq=1046798/1046802 fqs=0
> [ 2504.181215] rcu: 4-...!: (2 ticks this GP)
> idle=522/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=1249063/1249064 fqs=0
> [ 2504.182625] rcu: 5-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=6da/1/0x4000000000000000
> softirq=1131036/1131047 fqs=0
> [ 2504.183955] (detected by 3, t=0 jiffies, g=1232529, q=1370)
> [ 2504.184762] Sending NMI from CPU 3 to CPUs 0:
> [ 2504.186400] NMI backtrace for cpu 0
> [ 2504.186401] CPU: 0 PID: 6670 Comm: 464 Not tainted 5.1.0+ #1
> [...
2019 May 17
2
[PATCH v9 2/7] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver
On 5/14/19 7:54 AM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> + if (!list_empty(&vpmem->req_list)) {
> + req_buf = list_first_entry(&vpmem->req_list,
> + struct virtio_pmem_request, list);
> + req_buf->wq_buf_avail = true;
> + wake_up(&req_buf->wq_buf);
> + list_del(&req_buf->list);
Yes, this change is the right one, thank you!
> + /*
> + * If
2019 May 17
2
[PATCH v9 2/7] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver
On 5/14/19 7:54 AM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> + if (!list_empty(&vpmem->req_list)) {
> + req_buf = list_first_entry(&vpmem->req_list,
> + struct virtio_pmem_request, list);
> + req_buf->wq_buf_avail = true;
> + wake_up(&req_buf->wq_buf);
> + list_del(&req_buf->list);
Yes, this change is the right one, thank you!
> + /*
> + * If
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...> 6d0: 66 data16
> 6d1: 6c insb (%dx),%es:(%edi)
> 6d2: 69 63 74 5f 70 00 74 imul $0x7400705f,0x74(%ebx),%esp
>
> -000006d8 <__FUNCTION__.22492>:
> - 6d8: 74 72 je 74c <__FUNCTION__.22568+0x64>
> - 6da: 75 65 jne 741 <__FUNCTION__.22568+0x59>
> +000006d8 <__FUNCTION__.22405>:
> + 6d8: 74 72 je 74c <__FUNCTION__.22481+0x64>
> + 6da: 75 65 jne 741 <__FUNCTION__.22481+0x59>
> 6dc: 5f po...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the
2008 May 21
0
Errors in using gdb (PR#11496)
...V0i/rGIvSmA/C9cDqR9rG2aq3P8QbtA18JXvfRp54i9xrjdCNr9CRsEE6cD
tFcqB0Azhy2XpYc9zCvDruYM4MX3UnkJSVUqQrKKcxG0k0gkgnYSD+2C2yoP7UK4KbSj90Wa
sdP+7Z7vO65XqbuDru96XjpLuO6qDNoBIGuJkBUZtCPoCt7aDFPRYozPAmiaZjZtHvgFn3aI
xmh5IBEchbyK08unj0KTNe9SwvA7E9rT3i+QAsRn8CxEYCXCbDD8TmcJAxXQni4RBGKdQDRW
/5nuMexZhkTQ3l1oH6jyr6DaQPua04KJG1UqRzBLu8DtI1C5IlrRmWT9qnCI4lsSiUQiaCfZ
WdqZO4oC2o3cY3Qs7Qi3cLKmE7icVwwbsnOhXXDG4F9ERZ8N5tqRCe2ItZg3lMDbaYbnnxfY
UWhhTh+F6GsN7Wj8R1u9GtrRbYb5yfDQjlnKhfZ0ifhHAPbARdBO7jH94R5jCe3BhA2jtTcF
aGeWdrWxXbCi5+I3C89wlSFiJ5FIBO2kYtDOL5XC+6UUhPZcn3YGt7yRXzgF7ltAO4MHZE7B
mYRBO7MwI5EyV/BcaEdzNMbByjGFdkRr...