search for: 6d53

...tfix and/or the LMTP configuration because upon RCPT TO, instead of forwarding the mail off to the configured smartest, somehow dovecot-lmtp is ending up in the mix. (Perhaps this is more a postfix question than a dovecot one, but, I?ll start here.) Relevant postfix config: [root at 81716ec5-bca4-6d53-ed81-bd1a55d46b4f /opt/local/etc/postfix]# postconf -n canonical_maps = hash:/opt/local/etc/postfix/canonical command_directory = /opt/local/sbin compatibility_level = 2 daemon_directory = /opt/local/libexec/postfix data_directory = /var/db/postfix debug_peer_level = 2 debugger_command = PATH=/bin:...

Am 11.08.2019 um 18:06 schrieb Coy Hile via dovecot: > And in syslog I see: > > 2019-08-11T15:37:57+00:00 81716ec5-bca4-6d53-ed81-bd1a55d46b4f postfix/smtpd[56103]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 12327F13D: client=ns1.coyhile.com[172.17.64.25] > 2019-08-11T15:38:40+00:00 81716ec5-bca4-6d53-ed81-bd1a55d46b4f postfix/cleanup[56365]: [ID 197553 mail.info] 12327F13D: message-id=<> > 2019-08-11T15:38:40+00:00 81716ec5-bca4...

...uery: iterate_query = SELECT username, domain FROM users But, when I do that, I end up doveadm backup -D -A -R -f ssh -i id_rsa.dsync imap01.coyhile.com /opt/local/bin/doveadm dsync-server -A doveadm(hile at coyhile.com@coyhile.com): Info: User no longer exists, skipping [root at 81716ec5-bca4-6d53-ed81-bd1a55d46b4f /tmp]# Note the extra ?@coyhile.com? in there. Thanks, ? Coy Hile coy.hile at coyhile.com

...gluster volume heal applicatif info Brick ipvr7.xxx:/mnt/gluster-applicatif/brick <gfid:e3b5ef36-a635-4e0e-bd97-d204a1f8e7ed> <gfid:f8030467-b7a3-4744-a945-ff0b532e9401> <gfid:def47b0b-b77e-4f0e-a402-b83c0f2d354b> <gfid:46f76502-b1d5-43af-8c42-3d833e86eb44> <gfid:d27a71d2-6d53-413d-b88c-33edea202cc2> <gfid:7e7f02b2-3f2d-41ff-9cad-cd3b5a1e506a> Status: Connected Number of entries: 6 Brick ipvr8.xxx:/mnt/gluster-applicatif/brick <gfid:47ddf66f-a5e9-4490-8cd7-88e8b812cdbd> <gfid:8057d06e-5323-47ff-8168-d983c4a82475> <gfid:5b2ea4e4-ce84-4f07-bd66-5a0...

...info > Brick ipvr7.xxx:/mnt/gluster-applicatif/brick > <gfid:e3b5ef36-a635-4e0e-bd97-d204a1f8e7ed> > <gfid:f8030467-b7a3-4744-a945-ff0b532e9401> > <gfid:def47b0b-b77e-4f0e-a402-b83c0f2d354b> > <gfid:46f76502-b1d5-43af-8c42-3d833e86eb44> > <gfid:d27a71d2-6d53-413d-b88c-33edea202cc2> > <gfid:7e7f02b2-3f2d-41ff-9cad-cd3b5a1e506a> > Status: Connected > Number of entries: 6 > > Brick ipvr8.xxx:/mnt/gluster-applicatif/brick > <gfid:47ddf66f-a5e9-4490-8cd7-88e8b812cdbd> > <gfid:8057d06e-5323-47ff-8168-d983c4a82475> &g...

...r7.xxx:/mnt/gluster-applicatif/brick >> <gfid:e3b5ef36-a635-4e0e-bd97-d204a1f8e7ed> >> <gfid:f8030467-b7a3-4744-a945-ff0b532e9401> >> <gfid:def47b0b-b77e-4f0e-a402-b83c0f2d354b> >> <gfid:46f76502-b1d5-43af-8c42-3d833e86eb44> >> <gfid:d27a71d2-6d53-413d-b88c-33edea202cc2> >> <gfid:7e7f02b2-3f2d-41ff-9cad-cd3b5a1e506a> >> Status: Connected >> Number of entries: 6 >> >> Brick ipvr8.xxx:/mnt/gluster-applicatif/brick >> <gfid:47ddf66f-a5e9-4490-8cd7-88e8b812cdbd> >> <gfid:8057d06e-5323-4...

...applicatif/brick >>> <gfid:e3b5ef36-a635-4e0e-bd97-d204a1f8e7ed> >>> <gfid:f8030467-b7a3-4744-a945-ff0b532e9401> >>> <gfid:def47b0b-b77e-4f0e-a402-b83c0f2d354b> >>> <gfid:46f76502-b1d5-43af-8c42-3d833e86eb44> >>> <gfid:d27a71d2-6d53-413d-b88c-33edea202cc2> >>> <gfid:7e7f02b2-3f2d-41ff-9cad-cd3b5a1e506a> >>> Status: Connected >>> Number of entries: 6 >>> >>> Brick ipvr8.xxx:/mnt/gluster-applicatif/brick >>> <gfid:47ddf66f-a5e9-4490-8cd7-88e8b812cdbd> >>&...

...gt; >> >> But, when I do that, I end up >> >> doveadm backup -D -A -R -f ssh -i id_rsa.dsync imap01.coyhile.com /opt/local/bin/doveadm dsync-server -A >> doveadm(hile at coyhile.com@coyhile.com): Info: User no longer exists, skipping >> [root at 81716ec5-bca4-6d53-ed81-bd1a55d46b4f /tmp]# >> >> Note the extra ?@coyhile.com? in there. >> >> Thanks, >> >> ? >> Coy Hile >> coy.hile at coyhile.com > > If your username field already contains domain, you do not need to return domain field separately. It is...

...ame, domain FROM users > > > But, when I do that, I end up > > doveadm backup -D -A -R -f ssh -i id_rsa.dsync imap01.coyhile.com /opt/local/bin/doveadm dsync-server -A > doveadm(hile at coyhile.com@coyhile.com): Info: User no longer exists, skipping > [root at 81716ec5-bca4-6d53-ed81-bd1a55d46b4f /tmp]# > > Note the extra ?@coyhile.com? in there. > > Thanks, > > ? > Coy Hile > coy.hile at coyhile.com If your username field already contains domain, you do not need to return domain field separately. It is only needed if your username field only c...

...t_mtime fields of the parent directory of each file. ext[23]_rename fail to update st_[cm]time of the target directory if the target file already existed. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab at suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstra?e 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."

On 07/07/2017 01:23 PM, Florian Leleu wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > first time on the ML so excuse me if I'm not following well the rules, > I'll improve if I get comments. > > We got one volume "applicatif" on three nodes (2 and 1 arbiter), each > following command was made on node ipvr8.xxx: > > # gluster volume info applicatif > > Volume

...01.coyhile.com /opt/local/bin/doveadm dsync-server -A </div> <div> doveadm( <a href="mailto:hile@coyhile.com">hile@coyhile.com</a>@coyhile.com): Info: User no longer exists, skipping </div> <div> [root@81716ec5-bca4-6d53-ed81-bd1a55d46b4f /tmp]# </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Note the extra “@coyhile.com” in there. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Thanks, </div> <div>...

Hello everyone, first time on the ML so excuse me if I'm not following well the rules, I'll improve if I get comments. We got one volume "applicatif" on three nodes (2 and 1 arbiter), each following command was made on node ipvr8.xxx: # gluster volume info applicatif Volume Name: applicatif Type: Replicate Volume ID: ac222863-9210-4354-9636-2c822b332504 Status: Started

On 2009-01-23 20:27, Török Edwin wrote: >>> >>> >> i'd not mind it at all if the kernel could be built with other open-source >> compilers too. >> >> Now in this case the patch you suggest might end up hurting the end result >> so it's not an unconditional 'yes'. But ... how much it actually matters >> depends on