Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "6cbcif2d".
1999 May 06
0
matrix weirdness
...5.000 NaN
5.000 6.000 0.490196
6.000 0.000 0.494485
6.000 1.000 0.495455
6.000 2.000 0.193032
6.000 3.000 0.272545
6.000 4.000 0.437288
6.000 5.000 0.490196
6.000 6.000 NaN
==========================
I read them into a data frame and do the plot.
data<-read.table("~/r/rt/data/unif/6cbcif2d.out",header=TRUE)
x<-unique(data$lag1)
y<-unique(data$lag2)
z<-matrix(data$cif2d,length(y),length(x))
image(x,y,z, col=gray(0:19/19),xlab="Lag 1 (s)", ylab="Lag 2 (s)")
Then I did:
> z
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7]
[1,] 17 16 8 11 12 10...
1999 May 06
1
x,y vs row,column
I think my problems are coused by a fundamental R incompatibility in how
matrices are stored and the usual way of specifying Cartesian coordinates.
When I do
data<-read.table("~/r/rt/data/unif/6cbcif2d.out",header=TRUE)
x<-unique(data$lag1)
y<-unique(data$lag2)
z<-matrix(data$cif2d,length(y),length(x))
This z matrix is printed apparently correctly from a Cartesian point of
view
> z
[,1] [,2] [,3]
[1,] 11 21 31
[2,] 12 22 32
[3,] 13 23 33
But if you look a...