Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "6c59".
Did you mean:
659
2019 Oct 02
5
Removed a DC but...
On 02/10/2019 13:52, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:
> samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix
> Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following.
>
> search for :
> CN=58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f
> And
> CN=16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75
>
> In _msdc.dom.tld.
> Verify which GUID is removed, you can see that, then remove the old server GUID.
>
> Run :
> dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it
> dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it...
2019 Oct 02
3
Removed a DC but...
Hai,
The steps shown here dont work?
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC
If that is the case and you besides that free of errors.
Then upgrade, and try again once your on at least samba 4.9 or 4.10.
As im hoping you are upgrade straight to Buster.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
2019 Oct 02
0
Removed a DC but...
samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix
Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following.
search for :
CN=58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f
And
CN=16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75
In _msdc.dom.tld.
Verify which GUID is removed, you can see that, then remove the old server GUID.
Run :
dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it
dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it
To see the name of the serve...
2019 Oct 02
2
Removed a DC but...
...--fix
>>> Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following.
>> Yes, but why wasn't it removed in the first place ?
> [...]
>>> Run :
>>> dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it
>>> dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it
> Effectively these CNAME return nothing.
>
> can i safely run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix'?
I do not see any reason why not.
>
>
>> Which method was used to demote the DC, standard demote or with
>> --demote-o...
2019 Oct 02
0
Removed a DC but...
...;GUID=bdab9051-0882-40ec-bf6e-b223e4adecd8>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=VDCUD1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it
Not removing dangling forward link
ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for msDS-NC-Replica-Locations in object CN=16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it - <GUID=f060b28c-e27e-45f0-89c1-527474a6919c>;<RMD_ADDTIME=131533251720000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=131533251720000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=bc3f89e3-8ce4-4ddd-956a-ea740e8b2f12>;<RMD_L...
2020 Oct 21
1
about the new added attributes "check" and "type" for interface mac element
...LTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state
UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0c:29:3b:e0:50 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.122.202/24 brd 192.168.122.255 scope global dynamic
noprefixroute enp11s0
valid_lft 3584sec preferred_lft 3584sec
inet6 fe80::2b79:4675:6c59:6822/64 scope link noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: enp12s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state
UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:0c:29:73:f6:dc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.122.33/24 brd 192.168.122.255 scope gl...
2019 Oct 02
0
Removed a DC but...
...dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix
> > Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following.
> Yes, but why wasn't it removed in the first place ?
[...]
> > Run :
> > dig CNAME 58eba604-07e5-4c5d-a104-9e6f4907248f._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it
> > dig CNAME 16b8c008-6c59-4b65-9f1b-530751904a75._msdcs.ad.fvg.lnf.it
Effectively these CNAME return nothing.
can i safely run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix'?
> Which method was used to demote the DC, standard demote or with
> --demote-other-dead-dc ?
Standard. I've followed the wiki page, eg:...