Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "6bd7ac58".
2004 Dec 23
2
[LLVMdev] A first!
Turns out it wasn't using the JIT. It was running the interpreter. The
X86 stuff wasn't being linked in. Alas, once I "fixed" that, it stopped
working. The JIT couldn't resolve the symbol "printf" and failed. But
the interpreter could resolve it.
Misha Brukman wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 08:48:19PM -0800, Jeff Cohen wrote:
>
>
>>I
2004 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] A first!
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 11:01:37PM -0800, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> Turns out it wasn't using the JIT. It was running the interpreter. The
> X86 stuff wasn't being linked in. Alas, once I "fixed" that, it stopped
> working. The JIT couldn't resolve the symbol "printf" and failed. But
> the interpreter could resolve it.
The interpreter has some hacks
2004 Dec 23
4
[LLVMdev] A first!
...for
> the JIT to work on Windows.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20041223/6bd7ac58/attachment.sig>