Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "6b66ee75".
2010 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for a new LLVM concurrency memory model
On Monday 26 April 2010 10:19:06 Renato Golin wrote:
> On 26 April 2010 15:59, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google.com> wrote:
> > To be clear, Chandler wasn't suggesting any change to the existing
> > load and store instructions. Instead, we were wondering if people like
> > the idea of _new_ atomic_load, atomic_store, atomic_cmpxchg, and maybe
> >
2010 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for a new LLVM concurrency memory model
On 26 April 2010 15:59, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google.com> wrote:
> To be clear, Chandler wasn't suggesting any change to the existing
> load and store instructions. Instead, we were wondering if people like
> the idea of _new_ atomic_load, atomic_store, atomic_cmpxchg, and maybe
> atomic_exchange and atomic_add instructions.
I see, in that case, I don't have any
2010 Apr 26
3
[LLVMdev] Proposal for a new LLVM concurrency memory model
...by decomposing them is more than LLVM should try to do.
Because of that, I'm not sure we should support vectors as elsewhere they
degrade gracefully.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100426/6b66ee75/attachment.html>