Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "6b4".
Did you mean:
64
2010 Aug 04
1
[LLVMdev] llc instability when generating ARM code - contractor desired
...ram /home/build/bin/llc-2.6 returned error code 0
3. More assertion failures when compiling program.bc from above using llc2.7.
4. The following assembler error message when assembling a file generated by llc2.7:
Build/Targets/arm-android-linux/Debug/program.bc:2102864: Error: invalid constant (6b4) after fixup
Program arm-eabi-g++ returned error code 1
and here is the line it's complaining about:
.set .LPCRELV133, (.LJTI8424_0_0-(.LPCRELL133+8))
.LPCRELL133:
add r0, pc, #.LPCRELV133
Sorry for the lack of detail into these issues. We've just begun running into the...
2008 Nov 13
5
BAD TRAP with Crossbow Beta October 31 2008
...amut genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 000000000128a468 000002a101694b20 0000000000010000 000000000185c8c0
Nov 12 14:04:16 bahamut %l4-7: 0000000000000000 0000030003f74000 000000000182850c 0000000000000000
Nov 12 14:04:16 bahamut genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a101694a20 unix:trap+6b4 (2a101694c30, 0, e00000034, e, 1828500, 1c00)
Nov 12 14:04:16 bahamut genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 000000000128a468 000002a101694b20 0000000000010000 000000000185c8c0
Nov 12 14:04:16 bahamut %l4-7: 0000000000000000 0000030003f74000 000000000182850c 0000000000000000
Nov 12 14:04:17 ba...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...gt;
> + 6ad: 73 5f jae 70e <__FUNCTION__.22481+0x26>
> + 6af: 70 61 jo 712 <__FUNCTION__.22481+0x2a>
> + 6b1: 72 65 jb 718 <__FUNCTION__.22481+0x30>
> 6b3: 6e outsb %ds:(%esi),(%dx)
> - 6b4: 74 5f je 715 <__FUNCTION__.22568+0x2d>
> + 6b4: 74 5f je 715 <__FUNCTION__.22481+0x2d>
> 6b6: 61 popa
> 6b7: 6c insb (%dx),%es:(%edi)
> 6b8: 69 61 73 5f 73 65 74 imul $0x7465735f,0x73(%...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the