search for: 69k

...l-3.21.0-2.el6.x86_64.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/nss-util-3.21.0-2.el6.x86_64.rpm> 2016-05-12 10:47 67K nss-util-devel-3.21.0-2.el6.i686.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/nss-util-devel-3.21.0-2.el6.i686.rpm> 2016-05-12 10:48 69K nss-util-devel-3.21.0-2.el6.x86_64.rpm <http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/nss-util-devel-3.21.0-2.el6.x86_64.rpm> 2016-05-12 10:48 69K Simply updating these packages on 6.3, would there be any issues w/o updating rest of the packages from 6.3 to 6.8? As I mentioned,...

..., you get similar bitrates. As you encode quieter and quieter noise, the extra cost of using _AUDIO mode vs _VOIP goes up. At the extreme, a 10s signal of white noise with amplitude of only 2 (16bit, 16kHz), I see a near doubling. The _VOIP encoded file is size 46KB, the _AUDIO encoded file is 69K. Now this does make sense -- in an audio mode, you want faithful reproduction of very quiet signals (reverb tails, etc). However, I wanted to ask the list if this is expected/known behaviour. I wonder if it is possible to engineer a scenario (using existing apis) that would give one the benef...

(i use the term loosely because i know that zfs likes whole volumes better) when installing ubuntu, i got in the habit of using a separate partition for my home directory so that my data and gnome settings would all remain intact when i reinstalled or upgraded. i''m running osol 2008.11 on an ultra 20, which has only two drives. i''ve got all my data located in my home directory,

...- 27.3G - zp1/public at bup-20100102-035216UTC 1.67M - 33.5G - zp1/public at bup-20100102-184101UTC 1.66M - 33.5G - zp1/public at bup-20100208-050707GMT 0 - 33.7G - zp1/public at bup-20100208-050907GMT 0 - 33.7G - zp1/raphael 69K 104G 20K /home/raphael zp1/raphael at bup-20090223-033745UTC 0 - 18K - zp1/raphael at bup-20090225-184857UTC 0 - 18K - zp1/raphael at bup-20090302-032437UTC 0 - 18K - zp1/raphael at bup-20090309-033514UTC 0 - 18K - zp1/raphael at bup-200...

...me-1.14.8-..> 22-Jul-2008 08:04 15k libgsf-gnome-devel-1..> 22-Jul-2008 08:03 9k libgsf-python-1.14.8..> 22-Jul-2008 07:59 17k lyx-1.5.5-1.i386.rpm 22-Jul-2008 08:04 9.4M lyx-debuginfo-1.5.5-..> 22-Jul-2008 08:02 31.7M lzma-4.32.0-0.6.beta..> 22-Jul-2008 08:04 69k lzma-debuginfo-4.32...> 22-Jul-2008 08:02 207k lzma-devel-4.32.0-0...> 22-Jul-2008 08:00 6k lzma-libs-4.32.0-0.6..> 22-Jul-2008 08:05 20k mendexk-2.6e-30Cento..> 22-Jul-2008 08:05 44k openafs-1.4.7-1.1Cen..> 22-Jul-2008 08:00 3.2M openafs-authlibs-1.4..> 22-Jul...

...97K 12M 3640 3642 2 21K 128K 21M 4784 4799 2 28K 168K 32M 5824 5835 3 39K 205K 56M 7664 7678 3 52K 269K 97M 9K 9K 3 69K 355K 168M 12K 12K 3 90K 467K 291M 17K 17K 3 119K 614K 504M 22K 22K 3 157K 808K 87...

We finally flipped the switch on one of our ZFS-based servers, with approximately 1TB of 2.8TB (3 stripes of 950MB or so, each of which is a RAID5 volume on the adaptec card). We have snapshots every 4 hours for the first few days. If you add up the snapshot references it appears somewhat high versus daily use (mostly mail boxes, spam, etc changing), but say an aggregate of no more than 400+MB a

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking