search for: 69

...tre for Global Health Research, Toronto,ON > ageassign <- function(x){ + y <- NA + if (x[11] %in% c(0:4)) {y <- "0-4"} + else if (x[11] %in% c(5:14)) {y <- "5-14" } + else if (x[11] %in% c(15:29)) {y <- "15-29" } + else if (x[11] %in% c(30:69)) {y <- "30-69"} + else if (x[11] %in% c(70:79)) {y <- "70-79"} + else if (x[11] %in% c(80:125)) {y <- "80+"} + return(y) + } > jj <- apply(mds[1:100,],1,FUN=ageassign) > jj 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9...

Hi Folks, More updates for Centos-3 (3.1 and 3.3) x86 and x86_64 Security: XFree86: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-478.html - i386: i386/RPMS/XFree86-cyrillic-fonts-4.3.0-69.EL.i386.rpm i386/RPMS/XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.3.0-69.EL.i386.rpm i386/RPMS/XFree86-4.3.0-69.EL.i386.rpm i386/RPMS/XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.3.0-69.EL.i386.rpm i386/RPMS/XFree86-base-fonts-4.3.0-69.EL.i386.rpm i386/RPMS/XFree86-font-utils-4.3.0-69.EL.i386.rpm i386/RPMS/XFree86-devel-4.3.0-69....

...ver connected with Asterisk. I managed to connect with a sipura phone or a grandstream, no problem. When I configure asterisk, I'm able to send out calls to the carrier no problems, however, receiving calls doesn't work, and I keep getting the following messages: <-- SIP read from 69.xx.xx.xx:5060: INVITE sip:s@10.0.0.200:5060;maddr=10.0.0.200 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:83555501@69.xx.xx.xx:5060;maddr=69.xx.xx.xx>, <sip:83555501@69.xx.xx.xx:5062;maddr=69.xx.xx.xx> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.xx.xx.xx:5060, SIP/2.0/UDP 69.xx.xx.xx:5062, SIP/2.0/UDP 69.xx.xx.xx:5062, SIP/2.0/...

...d_domain_master_name_query_fail(358) find_domain_master_name_query_fail: Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name BCCFILOTTRANO<1b> for the workgroup BCCFILOTTRANO. Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup. [2002/07/10 13:21:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.113.160.96: code = 0x12 [2002/07/10 13:21:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.113.160.96: code = 0x12 [2002/07/10 13:25:35, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet:...

I have a server located remotely running CentOS 5.x. I need to have two IP's on the same interface. So I have this: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=69.x.x.199 HWADDR=00:x:x:x:c6:10 IPADDR=69.x.x.194 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 NETWORK=69.x.x.192 ONBOOT=yes GATEWAY=69.x.x.193 TYPE=Ethernet So I added this: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=69.x.x.199 HWADDR=00:x:x:x:c6:10 IPADDR=69.x.x.195 NETMASK=255.2...

...73, 216, 0, 3, 41, 114, 80, 279, 68, 178, 0, 4, 31, 100, 80, 284, 68, 149, 0, 5, 61, 190, 110, 315, 68, 182, 1, 6, 61, 130, 88, 250, 70, 185, 0, 7, 44, 130, 94, 298, 68, 161, 0, 8, 58, 110, 74, 384, 67, 175, 0, 9, 52, 120, 80, 310, 66, 144, 0, 10, 52, 120, 80, 337, 67, 130, 0, 11, 52, 130, 80, 367, 69, 162, 0, 12, 40, 120, 90, 273, 68, 175, 0, 13, 49, 130, 75, 273, 66, 155, 0, 14, 34, 120, 80, 314, 74, 156, 0, 15, 37, 115, 70, 243, 65, 151, 0, 16, 63, 140, 90, 341, 74, 168, 0, 17, 28, 138, 80, 245, 70, 185, 0, 18, 40, 115, 82, 302, 69, 225, 0, 19, 51, 148, 110, 302, 69, 247, 1, 20, 33, 120, 70,...

...0 18 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 aa 3 0 0 10 0 0 0 a6 3 0 0 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 bc 3 0 0 1e 0 0 0 c6 3 0 0 20 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 e6 3 0 0 1e 0 0 0 f0 3 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 32 0 0 0 6f 0 62 0 6a 0 65 0 63 0 74 0 47 0 55 0 49 0 44 0 0 0 f8 b3 f c6 9b 5e b9 43 ac 2d c7 db 67 5c 32 f3 64 0 65 0 73 0 63 0 72 0 69 0 70 0 74 0 69 0 6f 0 6e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 72 0 69 0 76 0 65 0 72 0 4e 0 61 0 6d 0 65 0 0 0 48 0 50 0 20 0 4c 0 61 0 73 0 65 0 72 0 4a 0 65 0 74 0 20 0 32 0 33 0 30 0 30 0 20 0 53 0 65 0 72 0 69 0 65 0 73 0 20 0 50 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 69 0 0...

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1155 xorg-x11 security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1155.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.69.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.69.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.69.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.69.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.69.x86_64.rpm...

...0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 [57] 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [113] 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 [169] 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 [225] 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 [281] 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0...

...67]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[68]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[69]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[70]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[71...

...67]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[68]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[69]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[70]’) [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] i8259.c:67:9: error: (near initialization for ‘interrupt[71...

...onal (sequential) test; is intervals marginal or approximate? Which should I trust as more accurate or, alternaitvely, more conservative? Partial output follows. Thanks for the insight. Hank > anova(fm0) numDF denDF F-value p-value (Intercept) 1 69 6331.902 <.0001 Fert 3 44 42.176 <.0001 Seed 1 44 0.488 0.4886 Litter 1 69 1.830 0.1805 Density 1 69 68.714 <.0001 Fert:Seed 3 44 0.061 0.9799 Fer...

...d I only receive the first page on every attempt. I think I have enabled debug output below. Can you tell me what the problem might be? I am using snapshot from oct 26. asterisk 1.2.13 and libtiff 3.6.1-12 from redat/centos 4.4. THanks, Jerry --------- Oct 28 13:13:40 DEBUG[22763]: app_txfax.c:69 span_message: FLOW FAX Set rx type 4 Oct 28 13:13:40 DEBUG[22763]: app_txfax.c:69 span_message: FLOW FAX Set tx type 0 Oct 28 13:13:42 DEBUG[22763]: app_txfax.c:69 span_message: FLOW FAX Set rx type 0 Oct 28 13:13:42 DEBUG[22763]: app_txfax.c:69 span_message: FLOW FAX Set tx type 8 Oct 28 13:13...

Hi, i have a huge problem ;] I have redirected port 69 from NET (internet) IP 212.122.68.129 to the local network (masq) 192.168.0.3, that all queries from internet goes to local network PC. ACCEPT net masq tcp 69 - DNAT net masq:192.168.0.3 tcp 69 - everything works fine from the internet, but now I cannot access this port from other loca...

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1155 xorg-x11 security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1155.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.69.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.8.2-1.EL.69.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.69.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/xorg-x11-devel-6.8.2-1.EL.69.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/xorg-x11-doc-6.8.2-1.EL.69.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/xorg-x11-font-utils-6.8....

At times our tftp servers are quite busy. Our network folk are rebuilding, and are anxious to tighten security. They hope to only allow tftp traffic on port 69, coming and going. This would bypass the RFC1350 client TID=ephemeral and server ACK TID=!69. Is there any chance tftpd-hpa would do this with "-R 69:69", or would this require tftpd-hpa to threaded, with a hairier connection lookup? Can the syslinux client be constrained to send tftp fr...

...,1,Dial(SIP,giusy) * Here the XLITE user data: *Display Name: gianca* *Username: 1234* *Password: pwd_gianca* *Authorization User Name: 1234* *Domain: 192.168.1.100* ** Here the output of wireshark in between Xlite client and asterisk server: ** *0040 2e 31 30 30 20 53 49 50 2f 32 2e 30 0d 0a 56 69 .100 SIP /2.0..Vi 0050 61 3a 20 53 49 50 2f 32 2e 30 2f 55 44 50 20 31 a: SIP/2 .0/UDP 1 0060 39 32 2e 31 36 38 2e 31 2e 31 31 36 3a 35 34 30 92.168.1 .116:540 0070 35 30 3b 62 72 61 6e 63 68 3d 7a 39 68 47 34 62 50;branc h=z9hG4b 0080 4b 2d 64 38 37 35 34 7a 2d 32 34 32 38 38 65 37...

...running on -d3: Working logon: ==================================Version 4.5.8-Ubuntu================================== [2018/03/26 16:32:38.889960, 3] ../lib/ldb-samba/ldb_wrap.c:325(ldb_wrap_connect) ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb [2018/03/26 16:32:38.896147, 3] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_util.c:69(debug_ntlmssp_flags) Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xe2088297 [2018/03/26 16:32:38.897060, 3] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_server.c:452(ntlmssp_server_preauth) Got user=[administrator] domain=[] workstation=[TEST] len1=24 len2=266 [2018/03/26 16:32:38.897302, 3] ../source4/auth/ntlm/auth.c:271(auth_check_...

Hello, this is just a point of curiosity with me. I want a sequence of numbers from 64 to 70, omitting the 2nd and 4th numbers. I can do it these ways: > seq(64, 70)[-c(2, 4)] [1] 64 66 68 69 70 > foo <- 64:70 > foo[-c(2, 4)] [1] 64 66 68 69 70 But how come this doesn't work? > 64:70[-c(2, 4)] [1] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 Just wondering. -- Stuart Luppescu -=- slu .at. ccsr.uchicago.edu University of Chicago -=- CCSR ???????? -=- Kernel 2.6.30-gentoo-r5...

What is required to get the mwi to work? Is it more of a phone subject or *? I have the mailbox= line in sip.conf, but only one extension is named, and in some of the examples, I have seen that there are two... What is that all about and how does it affect the extensions.conf and voicemail.conf? Thanks again..... Just some background as you start seeing my lists, I just started my own business