Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "682528eb7b".
2013 Jan 12
1
Tag flac as flac 1.2.1_git
...est to stick to that, but you're doing the work, so you pick up
what you think best or easiest. I believe however it is good to have rules
that precisely govern what number changes.
Cheers,
Pyt.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo - mle+la at mega-nerd.com
<flac-dev.pyt.682528eb7b.mle+la#mega-nerd.com at ob.0sg.net> wrote:
> pyth.flac-dev.5.pyt at spamgourmet.com wrote:
>
> > I seem to recall that changes in the second number indicated a minor
> change
> > in the *format* of the file itself (for example, 1.1.x to 1.2.x
> introduced
> > a new...
2013 Jan 12
5
Tag flac as flac 1.2.1_git
...or 24-bit files). Are there any format
changes that would justify that ? Otherwise, 1.2.2 would seem more
appropriate, not to minimize the work that you are doing...
Cheers,
Pyt.
http://www.mjuware.com
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo - mle+la at mega-nerd.com
<flac-dev.pyt.682528eb7b.mle+la#mega-nerd.com at ob.0sg.net> wrote:
> I'm currently looking to name it 1.3.0rc1. 1.3.0 because its been so
> long since the last offical release and because of the change of
> maintainership.
>
--
Pierre-Yves Thoulon
+33 (0)6 33 39 75 76
-------------- next part ------...
2013 Jan 08
2
Tag flac as flac 1.2.1_git
I agree on everything you said. I did not intend or expect to have
pre-release flac bundled with software, but can understand the dismay at my
earlier request.
If people think there should be a snapshot version for testing, I'm all for
it, especially now that the build system has undergone some changes. I
found that for some source distros, the removal of autogen.sh's prior
features and