search for: 6800

...o then I issue # ctdb enable on each node. After that ctdb will not be able to assign the public ip addresses. On the first node I get repeatedly: > 2012/05/24 14:32:09.408217 [ 6773]: Forced running of eventscripts with argument > s ipreallocated > 2012/05/24 14:32:09.442628 [recoverd: 6800]: Public address '10.94.43.67' is not > assigned and we could serve this ip > 2012/05/24 14:32:09.442643 [recoverd: 6800]: Public address '10.94.43.66' is not > assigned and we could serve this ip > 2012/05/24 14:32:09.442648 [recoverd: 6800]: Public address '10.94...

...2 lines with Alert-Info and my phones return a 400 Bad Request... I've checked in my config files, there is only one line with Set(__ALERT_INFO..... Any idea?? PS: I'm using Asterisk Asterisk 1.4.13-BRIstuffed-0.4.0-test4 Thanks Alert-Info: Ringer-2. Alert-Info: Ringer-2. exten => 6800,1,Macro(user-callerid,) exten => 6800,n,GotoIf($["foo${BLKVM_OVERRIDE}" = "foo"]?skipdb) exten => 6800,n,GotoIf($["${DB(${BLKVM_OVERRIDE})}" = "TRUE"]?skipov) exten => 6800,n(skipdb),Set(__NODEST=) exten => 6800,n,Set(__BLKVM_OVERRIDE=BLKVM/${EXTE...

...ialplan fragment, where the call is being dialed into [macro-process-routing] over an iax2 channel from another (same build) Asterisk server: [macro-process-routing] ; This is the entrypoint of the debug call but is also refered to by Macro(process-routing) elsewhere in the dialplan ; XXX-NNN-6800 exten => _6800,1,Macro(6800-interceptor) ; This is matched when 8 is dialed during macro-6800-interceptor,s,4 exten => _8,1,Playback(welcome) exten => _8,2,Hangup [macro-6800-interceptor] exten => s,1,DigitTimeout,2 exten => s,2,ResponseTimeout,7 exten => s,3,Answer e...

...: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on hypatia.math.ethz.ch X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_60,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no version=2.63 Hello, I want to validate my data for working with CART. I need to now how to create a randomized column of some 6800 intgers within R . I did not understand the manual concerning the possibilities to random data, sorry. Thanks a lot for your help! Susanne Osterkamp

It turns hard to make XEN 3.0 running on my middle-sized server. Now when XEN 3.0 is released I first successfully put it on several PCs and then decided to probe it on SMP and PAE enabled Dell PowerEdge 6800 server. And experienced intermittent hangs just after dom0 comes up. The [login:] prompt comes up and the server hangs completely for a while and in some 2-10 minutes releases just to let me see it is OK and in a few minutes hangs again. Everything is hang - the keyboard and the network. When it is...

I recently acquired an old PowerMac G5 that has an AGP GeForce 6800 Ultra (NV40) in it. I put debian stretch (testing) on it and am having issues getting the 6800 Ultra working with nouveau. Software versions: linux: 4.4.0 (powerpc) libdrm: 2.4.65 mesa: 11.0.8 nouveau: 1.0.12 On boot when the system starts Xorg I get an initially black screen that finally changes...

Hi All, Just a quick update on the Motorola 6800 backend: Based on the feedback, "M68k" (with lowercase "k") will now be the canonical target name and "m68k" be the target triple name. I've updated all the patches under review to reflect this change. I'm also asking for everyone's help to review all the...

Hello! On 11/3/20 6:10 PM, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: > Just a quick update on the Motorola 6800 backend: Based on the feedback, > "M68k" (with lowercase "k") will now be the canonical target name and > "m68k" be the target triple name. I've updated all the patches under review > to reflect this change. Are there any news on this? The M68k buildbot i...

...quires any infrastructure in the generic CodeGen logic to support it and is imposing a maintenance cost on the rest of the compiler). It sounds as if there's a fairly active community of m68k enthusiasts (I'm assuming that, in spite of the title of this thread, we are talking about the 68000, not the 6800), so I expect that the promotion to supported back end should go fairly smoothly. Note that, so far, I've been about the only person reviewing the CSKY patches and have very little spare bandwidth to do it at the moment. I'd encourage the m68k maintainers to take a look a...

...ntal backend can be added to trunk? I guess we need a "Backend: M68k" bugzilla component - is there anything else? On 13/11/2020 22:41, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello! > > On 11/3/20 6:10 PM, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: >> Just a quick update on the Motorola 6800 backend: Based on the feedback, >> "M68k" (with lowercase "k") will now be the canonical target name and >> "m68k" be the target triple name. I've updated all the patches under review >> to reflect this change. > Are there any news on this? The...

Hi Min! On 11/3/20 6:10 PM, Min-Yih Hsu wrote: > Showing the prerequisites to become an experimental target and eventually, > an official target. We're currently struggling on setting up the buildbot > but I believe Adrian (CC-ed) is working on that. So I hope the patches can > be sorted out while waiting for the buildbot. The m68k machine is actually already up and running, I

On 11/15/20 9:33 PM, Simon Pilgrim via llvm-dev wrote: > As well as the actual patch reviews, has there been official approval that the > M68k experimental backend can be added to trunk? I guess we need a > "Backend: M68k" bugzilla component - is there anything else? Sounds good. I'll file that bug tomorrow. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz :

...etely random. > > The reason it is random is the worry that multiple R instances on the same > machine might collide. ?All processes on the machine see the same ports. Related: I'd like to suggest an option/environment variable that specifies the set of port numbers sampled from, e.g. 6800:6850 or similar. The reason is that in some places, the user don't have admin privileges on the computer and most/all ports are blocked from running servers, and there is a sysadm that needs to approve each port to be unblocked. With such a security polices it is possible to have the smaller...

Hi, On behalf of one of our users, I installed R 1.8.1 on HP-UX11.0 by compiling the source using the gnu compilers and all was fine with make check On 1.9.0, I get an error from 'make check' when running reg-tests-1.R which gives error exit code 1. Commands used are: ./configure --prefix=/apps/global/Gnu_R/R-1.9.0 --with-x R_BROWSER=mozilla (all on one line, of course) make make

...the possibility to decide about the production readyness of the backend and consequently whether it's worth to keep or not. > It sounds as if there's a fairly active community of m68k enthusiasts (I'm assuming > that, in spite of the title of this thread, we are talking about the 68000, not the 6800), > so I expect that the promotion to supported back end should go fairly smoothly. Yes, despite its age, the architecture is still very popular. It has only little commercial relevance, unsurprisingly, but there is still new hardware being made and there are even new variants of...

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15650 Summary: Hard freeze when starting X with GeForce 6800 GS (NV43) Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org...

I know it's really early in the project's life, but another question I had: How does the generated 68K code perform, at least compared to modern GCC? -- Chris

On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 19:13, Min-Yih Hsu <minyihh at uci.edu> wrote: > Thanks for all your feedback, those were extremely helpful, especially the > guidelines to split the patches. I think in my case, patch 3 ~ 6 are the > most problematic, I will rework them shortly. > Perfect, thanks! And most importantly, I'll present a roadmap regarding blockers we need to > clear

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 1:27 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 11/15/20 9:33 PM, Simon Pilgrim via llvm-dev wrote: > > As well as the actual patch reviews, has there been official approval that the > > M68k experimental backend can be added to trunk? I guess we need a > > "Backend: M68k" bugzilla component -

Hi all I want to look at setting up a simple / cheap SAN / NAS server using normal PIV motherboard, 2GB (or even more) RAM, Core 2 Duo CPU (probably a Intel 6700 / 6750 / 6800) & some SATA HDD's (4 or 6x 320GB - 750GB). My budget is limited, so I can't afford a pre-built NAS device. Can this be done with CentOS? I've been looking FreeNAS (which is built on FreeBSD), and it look like a great project, but since the hardware support in FreeBSD is limit,...