search for: 679be8b

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "679be8b".

2020 Jun 05
0
[RFC 11/12] rpmsg: increase buffer size and reduce buffer number
...nnadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at linux.intel.com> > > --- > > include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h b/include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h > > index 679be8b..1add468 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h > > @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ enum rpmsg_ns_flags { > > * can change this without changing anything in the firmware of the remote > > * processor. > > */ > > -#defin...
2020 May 27
10
[PATCH v3 0/5] Add a vhost RPMsg API
v3: - address several checkpatch warnings - address comments from Mathieu Poirier v2: - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype - drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently an RFC - address comments from Pierre-Louis Bossart: * remove "default n" from Kconfig Linux supports RPMsg over VirtIO for "remote processor" /AMP use cases.
2020 May 27
10
[PATCH v3 0/5] Add a vhost RPMsg API
v3: - address several checkpatch warnings - address comments from Mathieu Poirier v2: - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype - drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently an RFC - address comments from Pierre-Louis Bossart: * remove "default n" from Kconfig Linux supports RPMsg over VirtIO for "remote processor" /AMP use cases.
2020 May 29
15
[RFC 00/12] Audio DSP VirtIO and vhost drivers
This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]
2020 May 29
15
[RFC 00/12] Audio DSP VirtIO and vhost drivers
This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]