search for: 67734d6d

I also believe this is the simplest versioning scheme*. It eliminates all future debates on this topic (e.g, when to bump major version etc) and solves the problem once and for all -- which is another plus :) *) similar suggestions a) start from 4, increase by 1; b) start from 40, increase by 1. Date based scheme is also a variant of it. David On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Reid Kleckner

I also support Chris's position of 4.0, 4.1 etc. I don't think "majorness" is that important, and we can sort out the bit code compatibility story some other way. Sent from phone On Jun 24, 2016 4:42 PM, "Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev" < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >

..._______________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160626/67734d6d/attachment.html>