Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "67635".
Did you mean:
67605
2007 Mar 05
2
File descriptor leak in 1.0rc2[45]?
...-a 22627 root cwd VDIR 0,6 512 405514 /var/run/dovecot
dovecot-a 22627 root txt VREG 0,5 175256 1083551 /usr (/dev/wd0f)
dovecot-a 22627 root txt VREG 0,5 7399 101747 /usr/lib/libcom_err.so.4.1
dovecot-a 22627 root txt VREG 0,0 1083908 67635 /lib/libcrypto.so.2.1
dovecot-a 22627 root txt VREG 0,0 866469 67587 /lib/libc.so.12.125
dovecot-a 22627 root txt VREG 0,0 24557 67605 /lib/libcrypt.so.0.2
dovecot-a 22627 root txt VREG 0,5 52783 101743 /usr/lib/libroken.so.12.3
dovecot-a 22627 root...
2017 Sep 05
0
Slow performance of gluster volume
OK my understanding is that with preallocated disks the performance with
and without shard will be the same.
In any case, please attach the volume profile[1], so we can see what else
is slowing things down.
-Krutika
[1] -
https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Monitoring%20Workload/#running-glusterfs-volume-profile-command
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Abi Askushi
2017 Sep 05
3
Slow performance of gluster volume
Hi Krutika,
I already have a preallocated disk on VM.
Now I am checking performance with dd on the hypervisors which have the
gluster volume configured.
I tried also several values of shard-block-size and I keep getting the same
low values on write performance.
Enabling client-io-threads also did not have any affect.
The version of gluster I am using is glusterfs 3.8.12 built on May 11 2017