Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "673b".
Did you mean:
673
2008 Nov 13
2
decoded sample is completely differen from original one
Hi all,
I have just started playing with speex, and come up with the following code, which just encode a frame of 160 shorts, and the decode it.
For some reason the decoded sample is completely different than the original one. is my code wrong? If so what? Or is it a reasonable which depends of values that weren't correctly set?
Thanks,
Andre
#include <stdio.h>
#include
2010 Jan 28
3
Repost: [patch] Automatically add keys to agent
...It's like sending
users "secure" self-extracting encrypted archives, teaching people that
it's sometimes OK after all to execute .exe's they receive in
emails--undermines best-practice training and will end badly.
--
Hank Leininger <hlein at korelogic.com>
BE5D FCCA 673B D18B 98A9 3175 896E 3D4A 1B4D C5AC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 447 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20100128/42053ff6/attach...
2010 Feb 01
1
"phishing" (was: [patch] Automatically add keys to agent)
...like "there must be an X display that ssh can talk to, to
pop the request up in"), but strong enough not to be faked out. ...If
that were sufficiently addressed, then this downside to AddKeyToAgent
would go away too.
Thanks,
--
Hank Leininger <hlein at korelogic.com>
BE5D FCCA 673B D18B 98A9 3175 896E 3D4A 1B4D C5AC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 443 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20100201/dcacfd06/attach...