search for: 66ba9378

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "66ba9378".

Did you mean: 669378
2014 Mar 28
2
[LLVMdev] Named register variables GNU-style
On 28 March 2014 02:06, Rafael EspĂ­ndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Correct. The proposed solution would work for all non allocatable > registers. We should probably still err if someone tries to use an > allocatable one. AFAIK, GCC reserves the allocatable registers. If we're going to do this we'd have to be as close as possible to the current behaviour to