search for: 669,12

...atic int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) if (ret < 0) goto out_vqs; + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF)) + vsock->mergeable = true; + vsock->rx_buf_nr = 0; vsock->rx_buf_max_nr = 0; atomic_set(&vsock->queued_replies, 0); @@ -640,8 +669,12 @@ static void virtio_vsock_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) vdev->config->reset(vdev); mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock); - while ((pkt = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX]))) - virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); + while ((pkt = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vsock-...

...atic int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) if (ret < 0) goto out_vqs; + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF)) + vsock->mergeable = true; + vsock->rx_buf_nr = 0; vsock->rx_buf_max_nr = 0; atomic_set(&vsock->queued_replies, 0); @@ -640,8 +669,12 @@ static void virtio_vsock_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) vdev->config->reset(vdev); mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock); - while ((pkt = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX]))) - virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); + while ((pkt = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vsock-...

.../net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ struct virtnet_info { /* Has control virtqueue */ bool has_cvq; + /* Host can handle any s/g split between our header and packet data */ + bool any_header_sg; + /* enable config space updates */ bool config_enable; @@ -669,12 +672,28 @@ static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq) static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb) { - struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr = skb_vnet_hdr(skb); + struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr; const unsigned char *dest = ((struct ethhdr *)skb->data)->h_dest; struct vi...

...) > if (ret < 0) > goto out_vqs; > > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF)) > + vsock->mergeable = true; > + > vsock->rx_buf_nr = 0; > vsock->rx_buf_max_nr = 0; > atomic_set(&vsock->queued_replies, 0); > @@ -640,8 +669,12 @@ static void virtio_vsock_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) > vdev->config->reset(vdev); > > mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock); > - while ((pkt = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX]))) > - virtio_transport_free_pkt(pkt); > + while ((pkt = vir...

From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:38:51 +0930 > If you convince DaveM, I won't object :) Simplifications are great, but not when the merge window opens up. Sorry, this isn't appropriate now.

From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:38:51 +0930 > If you convince DaveM, I won't object :) Simplifications are great, but not when the merge window opens up. Sorry, this isn't appropriate now.

...gt;> >> + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF)) >> + vsock->mergeable = true; >> + >> vsock->rx_buf_nr = 0; >> vsock->rx_buf_max_nr = 0; >> atomic_set(&vsock->queued_replies, 0); >> @@ -640,8 +669,12 @@ static void virtio_vsock_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev) >> vdev->config->reset(vdev); >> >> mutex_lock(&vsock->rx_lock); >> - while ((pkt = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_RX]))) >> - virtio_transport_free...

..._int (0)) { + v = Field (retv, 0); + if (add_string (&ret, String_val (v)) == -1) + return NULL; + retv = Field (retv, 1); + } + + if (end_stringsbuf (&ret) == -1) + return NULL; + + return take_stringsbuf (&ret); /* caller frees */ +} + "; List.iter ( @@ -669,12 +689,14 @@ copy_mountable (const mountable_t *mountable) (match ret with | RErr -> assert false - | RInt _ -> assert false + | RInt _ -> + pr " CAMLreturnT (int, Int_val (retv));\n" | RInt64 _ -> assert false - | RBool _...

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at intel.com> The following patch series is available at, git://git.zytor.com/users/mfleming/syslinux.git elflink All patches are against the 'elflink' branch. This series fixes a few serious bugs and some behavioural incompatibilities with the 4.x series. Matt Fleming (19): ldlinux: Initialise 'p' before using it. ldlinux: Parse

Previously posted as part of the mega utilities/inspection series here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00232.html What I've done is to extract just the parts related to rewriting daemon APIs in OCaml, rebase them on top of the current master, fix a few things, and recompile and test everything. Rich.

This is a combination of: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00046.html [PATCH 00/12] Refactor utility functions. plus: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00023.html [PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml. with the second patches rebased on top of the utility refactoring, and some other adjustments and extensions. This passes

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid