search for: 66849

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "66849".

Did you mean: 6649
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...l 3 27525 0 0.01 27492 0 0.01 27492 jcmarker.ll 18 83232 0 0.02 83199 0 0.02 83199 jcmaster.ll 8 154685 0 0.02 154652 0 0.02 154652 jcomapi.ll 4 9668 0 0.01 9635 0 0.01 10218 jcparam.ll 13 104349 0 0.01 104316 0 0.02 104316 jcphuff.ll 15 135194 0 0.02 135161 0 0.02 135161 jcprepct.ll 6 66882 0 0.01 66849 0 0.01 66849 jcsample.ll 10 92605 0 0.02 92572 0 0.01 92572 jctrans.ll 7 83622 0 0.02 83589 0 0.02 83589 jdapimin.ll 10 76843 0 0.01 76810 0 0.01 74872 jdapistd.ll 6 62628 0 0.01 62595 0 0.01 62595 jdatadst.ll 4 22334 0 0.01 22301 0 0.01 22301 jdatasrc.ll 5 25127 0 0.01 25094 0 0.01 25094 jdcoefct....