Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "668,39".
Did you mean:
668,19
2019 Mar 26
0
[PATCH nbdkit v4 01/15] server: Implement extents/can_extents calls for plugins and filters.
...(conn, 0));
+
+ debug ("can_extents");
+
+ if (p->plugin.can_extents)
+ return p->plugin.can_extents (connection_get_handle (conn, 0));
+ else
+ return p->plugin.extents != NULL;
+}
+
static int
plugin_can_fua (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn)
{
@@ -651,6 +668,39 @@ plugin_zero (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn,
return r;
}
+static int
+plugin_extents (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn,
+ uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, uint32_t flags,
+ struct nbdkit_extents *extents, int *err)
+{
+ struct backend...
2019 Mar 28
0
[PATCH nbdkit v5 FINAL 01/19] server: Implement extents/can_extents calls for plugins and filters.
...(conn, 0));
+
+ debug ("can_extents");
+
+ if (p->plugin.can_extents)
+ return p->plugin.can_extents (connection_get_handle (conn, 0));
+ else
+ return p->plugin.extents != NULL;
+}
+
static int
plugin_can_fua (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn)
{
@@ -651,6 +668,39 @@ plugin_zero (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn,
return r;
}
+static int
+plugin_extents (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn,
+ uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, uint32_t flags,
+ struct nbdkit_extents *extents, int *err)
+{
+ struct backend...
2019 Mar 26
21
[PATCH nbdkit v4 00/15] Implement Block Status.
I'm not sure exactly which version we're up to, but let's say it's
version 4.
I'm a lot happier with this version:
- all filters have been reviewed and changed where I think that's necessary
- can_extents is properly defined and implemented now
- NBD protocol is followed
- I believe it addresses all previous review points where possible
The "only" thing
2019 Mar 28
32
[PATCH nbdkit v5 FINAL 00/19] Implement extents.
This has already been pushed upstream. I am simply posting these here
so we have a reference in the mailing list in case we find bugs later
(as I'm sure we will - it's a complex patch series).
Great thanks to Eric Blake for tireless review on this one. It also
seems to have identified a few minor bugs in qemu along the way.
Rich.