search for: 668,39

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "668,39".

Did you mean: 668,19
2019 Mar 26
0
[PATCH nbdkit v4 01/15] server: Implement extents/can_extents calls for plugins and filters.
...(conn, 0)); + + debug ("can_extents"); + + if (p->plugin.can_extents) + return p->plugin.can_extents (connection_get_handle (conn, 0)); + else + return p->plugin.extents != NULL; +} + static int plugin_can_fua (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn) { @@ -651,6 +668,39 @@ plugin_zero (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn, return r; } +static int +plugin_extents (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn, + uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, uint32_t flags, + struct nbdkit_extents *extents, int *err) +{ + struct backend...
2019 Mar 28
0
[PATCH nbdkit v5 FINAL 01/19] server: Implement extents/can_extents calls for plugins and filters.
...(conn, 0)); + + debug ("can_extents"); + + if (p->plugin.can_extents) + return p->plugin.can_extents (connection_get_handle (conn, 0)); + else + return p->plugin.extents != NULL; +} + static int plugin_can_fua (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn) { @@ -651,6 +668,39 @@ plugin_zero (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn, return r; } +static int +plugin_extents (struct backend *b, struct connection *conn, + uint32_t count, uint64_t offset, uint32_t flags, + struct nbdkit_extents *extents, int *err) +{ + struct backend...
2019 Mar 26
21
[PATCH nbdkit v4 00/15] Implement Block Status.
I'm not sure exactly which version we're up to, but let's say it's version 4. I'm a lot happier with this version: - all filters have been reviewed and changed where I think that's necessary - can_extents is properly defined and implemented now - NBD protocol is followed - I believe it addresses all previous review points where possible The "only" thing
2019 Mar 28
32
[PATCH nbdkit v5 FINAL 00/19] Implement extents.
This has already been pushed upstream. I am simply posting these here so we have a reference in the mailing list in case we find bugs later (as I'm sure we will - it's a complex patch series). Great thanks to Eric Blake for tireless review on this one. It also seems to have identified a few minor bugs in qemu along the way. Rich.