search for: 664503d3

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "664503d3".

2012 Feb 09
0
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
By the way, the reason I'm bringing this up is that a number of folks are currently working on optimizing the use of hash tables within LLVM's code base, and unless we can come up with a common hashing facility, there will be an increasing proliferation of cut & paste copies of hash functions. So feedback would be nice. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Talin <viridia at
2012 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
LLVM currently has a bunch of different hashing algorithms scattered throughout the code base. There's also a number of places in the code where a FoldingSetNodeID is created for the purpose of calculating a hash, and then discarded. From an efficiency standpoint, this isn't all that bad unless the number of individual items being hashed > 32, at which point the SmallVector overflows
2012 Feb 13
5
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
...> thus only make sense for larger key sizes. >> >> -- >> -- Talin >> > > > > -- > -- Talin > -- -- Talin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120212/664503d3/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Hashing.h Type: text/x-chdr Size: 4038 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120212/664503d3/attachment.h>