Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "664503d3".
2012 Feb 09
0
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
By the way, the reason I'm bringing this up is that a number of folks are
currently working on optimizing the use of hash tables within LLVM's code
base, and unless we can come up with a common hashing facility, there will
be an increasing proliferation of cut & paste copies of hash functions. So
feedback would be nice.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Talin <viridia at
2012 Feb 08
2
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
LLVM currently has a bunch of different hashing algorithms scattered
throughout the code base.
There's also a number of places in the code where a FoldingSetNodeID is
created for the purpose of calculating a hash, and then discarded. From an
efficiency standpoint, this isn't all that bad unless the number of
individual items being hashed > 32, at which point the SmallVector
overflows
2012 Feb 13
5
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
...> thus only make sense for larger key sizes.
>>
>> --
>> -- Talin
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Talin
>
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120212/664503d3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Hashing.h
Type: text/x-chdr
Size: 4038 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120212/664503d3/attachment.h>