search for: 6641f

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "6641f".

Did you mean: 6641
2018 Feb 07
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
.../mmu.o In file included from arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c:9: ./arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h:189:23: [0;1;31merror: invalid operand in inline asm: 聽聽聽聽聽聽'mov $4, %r8999: .pushsection .discard.nospec .long 999b - . .popsection 聽聽聽聽聽聽661: call *$5662:.skip -(((6651f-6641f)-(662b-661b)) > 0) * 聽聽聽聽聽聽((6651f-6641f)-(662b-661b)),0x90663:.pushsection .altinstructions,"a" 聽聽聽聽聽聽.long 661b - . .long 6641f - . .word ( 7*32+12) .byte 663b-661b .byte 聽聽聽聽聽聽6651f-6641f .byte 663b-662b.popsection.pushsection .altinstr_replacement, 聽聽聽聽聽聽"ax"6641: call __...
2018 Feb 07
6
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
I've landed the patch in r324449. Before we merge this into two different Clang release branches and almost immediately release one of them, I would really like someone to confirm that this patch works well with the Linux kernel. David, if you're up for that, it would be great. Alternatively, Guenter or someone else here can help. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:59 PM Chandler Carruth