search for: 662b

...2 聽 CC聽聽聽聽聽聽arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.o In file included from arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c:9: ./arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h:189:23: [0;1;31merror: invalid operand in inline asm: 聽聽聽聽聽聽'mov $4, %r8999: .pushsection .discard.nospec .long 999b - . .popsection 聽聽聽聽聽聽661: call *$5662:.skip -(((6651f-6641f)-(662b-661b)) > 0) * 聽聽聽聽聽聽((6651f-6641f)-(662b-661b)),0x90663:.pushsection .altinstructions,"a" 聽聽聽聽聽聽.long 661b - . .long 6641f - . .word ( 7*32+12) .byte 663b-661b .byte 聽聽聽聽聽聽6651f-6641f .byte 663b-662b.popsection.pushsection .altinstr_replacement, 聽聽聽聽聽聽"ax"6641: call __x86_ind...

Hi all, This is version three of the patches I previously posted here: v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-1-will at kernel.org/ v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630173734.14057-1-will at kernel.org Changes since v2 include: * Actually add the barrier in READ_ONCE() for Alpha! * Implement Alpha's smp_load_acquire() using __READ_ONCE(), rather than the other

Hi everyone, This is the long-awaited version two of the patches I previously posted in November last year: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-1-will at kernel.org/ I ended up parking the series while the READ_ONCE() implementation was being overhauled, but with that merged during the recent merge window and LTO patches being posted again [1], it was time for a refresh. The

Hi everyone, This is the long-awaited version two of the patches I previously posted in November last year: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-1-will at kernel.org/ I ended up parking the series while the READ_ONCE() implementation was being overhauled, but with that merged during the recent merge window and LTO patches being posted again [1], it was time for a refresh. The

I've landed the patch in r324449. Before we merge this into two different Clang release branches and almost immediately release one of them, I would really like someone to confirm that this patch works well with the Linux kernel. David, if you're up for that, it would be great. Alternatively, Guenter or someone else here can help. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:59 PM Chandler Carruth

..."\n" \ + " .align 4\n" \ + " .long 661b\n" /* label */ \ + " .long 663f\n" /* new instruction */ \ + " .byte %c0\n" /* feature bit */ \ + " .byte 662b-661b\n" /* sourcelen */ \ + " .byte 664f-663f\n" /* replacementlen */ \ + ".previous\n" \ + ".section .altinstr_replacement,\"ax\"\n" \ + "663:\n\t" newinstr "\n664:\n" /* replace...

..."\n" \ + " .align 4\n" \ + " .long 661b\n" /* label */ \ + " .long 663f\n" /* new instruction */ \ + " .byte %c0\n" /* feature bit */ \ + " .byte 662b-661b\n" /* sourcelen */ \ + " .byte 664f-663f\n" /* replacementlen */ \ + ".previous\n" \ + ".section .altinstr_replacement,\"ax\"\n" \ + "663:\n\t" newinstr "\n664:\n" /* replace...

...061 636b |ct_unix(/fs/pack| 0x0020 6167 652f 6d6f 756e 742f 7061 636b 6167 |age/mount/packag| 0x0030 652f 686f 7374 2f73 7066 2e62 6961 6978 |e/host/spf.biaix| 0x0040 2e6f 7267 2f66 6f72 6569 676e 2f64 6f76 |.org/foreign/dov| 0x0050 6563 6f74 2d32 2e31 2e31 302b 7370 662b |ecot-2.1.10+spf+| 0x0060 322f 7072 6566 6978 2f76 6172 2f72 756e |2/prefix/var/run| 0x0070 2f64 6f76 6563 6f74 2f61 7574 682d 6d61 |/dovecot/auth-ma| 0x0080 7374 6572 2920 6661 696c 6564 3a20 496e |ster) failed: In| 0x0090 7661 6c69 6420 6172 6775 6d65 6e74 0a |v...

Hi everyone, I have devise 1.5.4 working with rails 3.0.20 and ruby 1.8.7 . I have extended the destroy action from the RegistrationController, to soft delete users instead of really deleting them from the database. def destroy # raise resouce.inspect # this is just to see if the test hits the action resource.soft_delete set_flash_message :notice, :destroyed sign_out resource