search for: 662b

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "662b".

Did you mean: 662
2018 Feb 07
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
....o In file included from arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c:9: ./arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h:189:23: [0;1;31merror: invalid operand in inline asm: 聽聽聽聽聽聽'mov $4, %r8999: .pushsection .discard.nospec .long 999b - . .popsection 聽聽聽聽聽聽661: call *$5662:.skip -(((6651f-6641f)-(662b-661b)) > 0) * 聽聽聽聽聽聽((6651f-6641f)-(662b-661b)),0x90663:.pushsection .altinstructions,"a" 聽聽聽聽聽聽.long 661b - . .long 6641f - . .word ( 7*32+12) .byte 663b-661b .byte 聽聽聽聽聽聽6651f-6641f .byte 663b-662b.popsection.pushsection .altinstr_replacement, 聽聽聽聽聽聽"ax"6641: call __x86_ind...
2018 Feb 07
6
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
I've landed the patch in r324449. Before we merge this into two different Clang release branches and almost immediately release one of them, I would really like someone to confirm that this patch works well with the Linux kernel. David, if you're up for that, it would be great. Alternatively, Guenter or someone else here can help. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:59 PM Chandler Carruth
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC] [PATCH] Split host arch headers for UML's benefit
...\ + " .align 4\n" \ + " .long 661b\n" /* label */ \ + " .long 663f\n" /* new instruction */ \ + " .byte %c0\n" /* feature bit */ \ + " .byte 662b-661b\n" /* sourcelen */ \ + " .byte 664f-663f\n" /* replacementlen */ \ + ".previous\n" \ + ".section .altinstr_replacement,\"ax\"\n" \ + "663:\n\t" newinstr "\n664:\n&qu...
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC] [PATCH] Split host arch headers for UML's benefit
...\ + " .align 4\n" \ + " .long 661b\n" /* label */ \ + " .long 663f\n" /* new instruction */ \ + " .byte %c0\n" /* feature bit */ \ + " .byte 662b-661b\n" /* sourcelen */ \ + " .byte 664f-663f\n" /* replacementlen */ \ + ".previous\n" \ + ".section .altinstr_replacement,\"ax\"\n" \ + "663:\n\t" newinstr "\n664:\n&qu...
2013 Jul 04
3
Rspec devise, testing extended RegistrationController action destroy
Hi everyone, I have devise 1.5.4 working with rails 3.0.20 and ruby 1.8.7 . I have extended the destroy action from the RegistrationController, to soft delete users instead of really deleting them from the database. def destroy # raise resouce.inspect # this is just to see if the test hits the action resource.soft_delete set_flash_message :notice, :destroyed sign_out resource