search for: 6565

Hi All, Actually I am working with the OpenSSH version 6.2p which is vulnerable to above mentioned vulnerabilities. So am looking for some help how I can fix these vulnerabilities in my version. I need to fix it in the OpenSSH code. Regards Abhishek

Hi Gert, Thanks for your reply. But we can't upgrade to 7.2 version also we don't have plan to upgrade in near future. Can I fix these vulnerabilities in the current version? Regards Abhishek On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:14:01PM +0530, abhi dhiman wrote: > > Actually I am working

...moving the office into a different domain and setting the local samba up as the PDC and somehow syncing the smbpasswd's. Not really a samba question I know, but maybe someone knows some magic that samba can do for me. Thanks -- _ __ Maunsell Ltd, IT Unit Tel : 0181-663-6565 /_| _/ ( _ '_// 160 Croydon Road, Fax : 0181-663-6723 ( |/)(/(/ __)//)/ //) Beckenham, Kent BR3 4DE Email: abs@maunsell.co.uk / England. -or- abs@maunsl00.demon.co.uk

...A6E838338E63A742C6435B at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxdu>") ("text" "plain" ("charset" "us-ascii") NIL NIL "quoted-printable" 2047 50)("text" "html" ("charset" "us-ascii") NIL NIL "quoted-printable" 6565 189) "alternative" 302)("text" "x-vcard" ("charset" "utf-8" "name" "ddkintz.vcf") NIL NIL "7bit" 415 14) "mixed")) Look through the line to the point where you see: "alternative" 302. The part the...

I did a cvs update this afternoon and since then asterisk doesn't seem to clean up the channels after they hangup. This has been working perfectly for quite some time previously... I do a show channels and it shows the channels still up. The only way out is to kill and restart asterisk.... I am frantically trying to would out how to get a non-current CVS copy of the source and get it back

Hi all. I bought Digium's dev kit and a used IBM PL300 PC to try it out in. The X100P works fine, but with the TDM400P I get what I can best describe as 'interrupt noise'... noise whenever I type a key on the keyboard, or when something accesses the disk drive, uses cpu, etc. In my other PC it works fine, no noise and sounds great. But I cannot dedicate the other PC to it.

...be 4 bytes long but was 41 Jun 10 03:42:17 WARNING[2961]: Chan_iax2.c:625 iax_error_output: Expecting callingtns to be 2 bytes long but was 42 Jun 10 03:42:17 WARNING[2961]: Chan_iax2.c:625 iax_error_output: Information element length exceeds message size Jun 10 03:42:17 WARNING[2961]: Chan_iax2.c:6565 socket_read: Undecodable frame received from 'XX.XX.XX.XX' Any help on debugging this would be great. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050613/83a2bf44/attachment.htm

...ut if the name is longer, samba follows Acad's instruction and writes an upper case file name. Has anyone seen anything similar - other software we use here (eg word, excel) seems to behave as expected. Thanks for any leads. -- _ __ Maunsell Ltd, IT Unit Tel : 0181-663-6565 /_| _/ ( _ '_// 160 Croydon Road, Fax : 0181-663-6723 ( |/)(/(/ __)//)/ //) Beckenham, Kent BR3 4DE Email: abs@maunsell.co.uk / England. -or- abs@maunsl00.demon.co.uk

...SA key ID 2F87AF6F gpg: Good signature from "Samba Distribution Verification Key <samba-bugs@samba.org>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 3275 F01D 6565 3A81 AE7B 320C D779 0A5F 2F87 AF6F $ gpg --verify samba-3.0.0rc3.tar.asc samba-3.0.0rc3.tar.bz2 gpg: Signature made Mon Sep 8 15:17:37 2003 BRT using DSA key ID 2F87AF6F gpg: BAD signature from "Samba Distribution Verification Key <samba-bugs@samba.org>" $ gpg --verify samba-3.0...

I am trying to setup a local printer that I have working in centos4.4 on centos 5, this is a server install no X. I was able to get the cups webpage up and it sees the printer I configured it up but when I try to print to it i get the following error: "/usr/lib/cups/filter/foomatic-rip failed", I've searched and searched but can't find anything that helps. I would like to try

...nction, but didn't work# > logLik(model1) [1] 8753.057 Warning message: In logLik.svyglm(model1) : svyglm not fitted by maximum likelihood. #I did the following which didn't work either# > with(model1, null.deviance - deviance) [1] 1039.695 > with(model2, df.null - df.residual) [1] 6565 > with(model2, pchisq(null.deviance - deviance, df.null - df.residual, + lower.tail = FALSE)) [1] 1 -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/goodness-of-fit-for-logistic-regression-with-survey-package-tp4646044.html Sent from the R help mailing li...

...verity::DEBUG suggest_diagnoses= SuggestDiagnosesController.new add_method(suggest_diagnoses, ''main_diagnoses'', ''params'') end end server = SymptomCheckerServer.new(''hws'', ''urn:hws'', ''192.168.1.201'', 6565) trap(:INT) do server.shutdown end server.start till now i was starting server from browser by accessing this controller. can anyone suggest me please thanks in advance.. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro...

I have a pdc samba 3+openldap+debian 5 and I need to migrate the ad windows (2003,2008 or 2012). How can I do this? -- Atenciosamente, Thiago Fortes Administrador de Redes DigithoBrasil 67 3345-6565

...5668 5687 5696 5700 5736 5740 5749 5764 5783 5809 5814 5853 5866 5867 5877 5888 5895 5896 5897 5898 5899 5908 5910 5911 5912 5939 5950 5958 5990 6000 6059 6074 6095 6097 6112 6137 6141 6189 6193 6212 6228 6229 6233 6271 6273 6275 6285 6310 6317 6335 6383 6384 6397 6427 6430 6459 6463 6482 6492 6506 6565 6585 6620 6670 6673 6675 6705 6715 6716 6741 6812 6826 6852 6859 6895 6896 6907 6913 6919 6935 6943 6948 6979 7023 7025 7035 7039 7042 7108 7131 7145 7163 7171 7172 7194 7198 7199 7203 7256 7257 7294 7303 7317 7322 7343 7344 7347 7348 7352 7386 7390 7391 7392 7393 7407 7408 7409 7417 7418 7419 7420...

...5736 5740 5749 5764 5783 5809 5814 5853 5866 5867 > 5877 5888 5895 5896 5897 5898 5899 5908 5910 5911 5912 5939 5950 5958 5990 > 6000 6059 6074 6095 6097 6112 6137 6141 6189 6193 6212 6228 6229 6233 6271 > 6273 6275 6285 6310 6317 6335 6383 6384 6397 6427 6430 6459 6463 6482 6492 > 6506 6565 6585 6620 6670 6673 6675 6705 6715 6716 6741 6812 6826 6852 6859 > 6895 6896 6907 6913 6919 6935 6943 6948 6979 7023 7025 7035 7039 7042 7108 > 7131 7145 7163 7171 7172 7194 7198 7199 7203 7256 7257 7294 7303 7317 7322 > 7343 7344 7347 7348 7352 7386 7390 7391 7392 7393 7407 7408 7409 7417...

...b/samba/sysvol read only = No [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/pml.lajeado.rs.gov.br/scripts read only = No So I hope someone can contribute. Thanks, Niumar Klein Niumar Andre Klein Infraestrutura [ http://www.solis.com.br/ | www.solis.com.br ] @solissolucoes ( 51) 3748-6565 [ https://www.solis.com.br/#solucoes | Conhe?a nossas?solu??es: ] - Gest?o Educacional - Diploma Digital - Central de Servi?os Digitais - Gest?o de Bibliotecas - Infraestrutura de TI - Gest?o Eletr?nica de Documentos

At the risk of angering the crash Gods, my sustem has NOT crashed again since I downgraded the kernel from 2.6.18-1.2239.fc5 to 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5. Given that newfound stability, and my lack of time, I'm going to put on hold any further diagnostics, until the next kernel revision is released. I have submitted a report at bugzilla.redhat.com (bug 218128). (Ah, nuts; accidentally created a

...t;>>> 5990 >>>>>> 6000 6059 6074 6095 6097 6112 6137 6141 6189 6193 6212 6228 6229 6233 >>>>>> 6271 >>>>>> 6273 6275 6285 6310 6317 6335 6383 6384 6397 6427 6430 6459 6463 6482 >>>>>> 6492 >>>>>> 6506 6565 6585 6620 6670 6673 6675 6705 6715 6716 6741 6812 6826 6852 >>>>>> 6859 >>>>>> 6895 6896 6907 6913 6919 6935 6943 6948 6979 7023 7025 7035 7039 7042 >>>>>> 7108 >>>>>> 7131 7145 7163 7171 7172 7194 7198 7199 7203 7256 7257 7294...

...6112 6137 6141 6189 6193 6212 6228 6229 >> 6233 >> >>>>>>> 6271 >> >>>>>>> 6273 6275 6285 6310 6317 6335 6383 6384 6397 6427 6430 6459 6463 >> 6482 >> >>>>>>> 6492 >> >>>>>>> 6506 6565 6585 6620 6670 6673 6675 6705 6715 6716 6741 6812 6826 >> 6852 >> >>>>>>> 6859 >> >>>>>>> 6895 6896 6907 6913 6919 6935 6943 6948 6979 7023 7025 7035 7039 >> 7042 >> >>>>>>> 7108 >> >>>>&g...

Hi, I am trying to get faster search results on our webmail client(Roundcube). Besides using Lucene for FTS are there other options? Would having all mails indexed give fast results? Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how much faster are we looking at? Really appreciate if someone could advise about this. Thanks Kevin