search for: 65535

We run unprivileged lxc containers (libvirt based) with next config: ... <idmap> <uid start='0' target='65535' count='65535'/> <gid start='0' target='65535' count='65535'/> </idmap> ... <devices> <emulator>/usr/libexec/libvirt_lxc</emulator> <filesystem type='mount' accessmode='passthrough'> &lt...

...quot;flowers" table. With a direct or ODBC connection, I guess you get that data in about 50 ms. Here is the tcpdump that shows all the round-trips when fetching and displaying the data. 20:55:09.128686 IP f29.attiksystem.ch.8924 > j20.attiksystem.ch.9000: S 2403473258:2403473258(0) win 65535 <mss 1444,nop,nop,sackOK> 20:55:09.128734 IP j20.attiksystem.ch.9000 > f29.attiksystem.ch.8924: S 1607928261:1607928261(0) ack 2403473259 win 65535 <mss 1460,sackOK,eol> 20:55:09.148167 IP f29.attiksystem.ch.8924 > j20.attiksystem.ch.9000: . ack 1 win 65535 20:55:09.167041 IP f29....

...m Shane <arlenslambert at gmail.com> --- Comment on attachment 134 --> https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/attachment.cgi?id=134 tcpdump of communication during which conntrack seems to "forget" packets 14:39:54.925957 IP Y.Y.Y.Y.1818 > X.X.X.X.2000: S 849153605:849153605(0) win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> 14:39:57.943185 IP Y.Y.Y.Y.1818 > X.X.X.X.2000: S 849153605:849153605(0) win 65535 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> 14:39:58.241750 IP X.X.X.X.2000 > Y.Y.Y.Y.1818: S 3217892892:3217892892(0) ack 849153606 win 15972 <mss 1452,nop,nop,sackOK> 14:39:58.242082...

...but the customer can connect perfectly with skype, use mail, internet etc... all of this program installed in their outside computers. I have configured the following shorewall rules. This is only one part: ACCEPT    fw    net    tcp    80 ACCEPT    fw    net    udp    -    43,53,123,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    loc    net    tcp    -    20,21,22,43,53,80,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    loc2    net    tcp    -    20,21,22,43,53,80,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    loc3    net    tcp    -    20,21,22,43,53,80,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    fw    net    tcp    -    20,21,22,43,53,80,443,1024:65535 ACCEPT    loc   ...

I have a samba version 3.024 server joined to a ADS as a "Workstation or server" acting as a file/print server. It is a Debian 4.0 amd64 up to date with stable. ftp works just fine so not network, must be samba config. vary slow file transfer when copying file from one computer but copy from two or more at the same time speed is 10 times faster. You will be copying a 600MG file with one

...9;= logTransi('FL10'), 'FL11'=logTransi('FL11')) testSet looks like this: > testSet flowFrame object 'MarjanD.20120926.A.0026.fcs' with 100000 cells and 14 observables: name desc range minRange maxRange $P1 pulse.width <NA> 65536 768 65535 $P2 FSC_PER <NA> 65536 0 65535 $P3 FSC_PAR <NA> 65536 0 65535 $P4 SSC <NA> 65536 0 65535 $P5 FL01 <NA> 65536 0 65535 $P6 FL02 <NA> 65536 0 65535 $P7 FL03 <NA> 65536...

Hi, I have the following problem while activating this rule entry using shorewall-shell: ACCEPT:notice:rul WAN:139.x.x.226 INT:139.x.x.153-139.x.x.156 udp 1024:65535 1024:65535 "-m iprange" in front of "--dst-range" is missing in the activation command. The logging entry (above) is set correct. Below is the debug output. Thanks Regards Günter + case $level in + /usr/sbin/iptables -A WAN2INT -p udp --sport 1024:65535 -s 139.x.x.226 -m...

Dear freinds, The pl script file which is available in the asterisk monitoring section of the voip-info.com expects username ,password and host parameters . Which one we should provied is the acconts we registered for asterisk or any thing else your help will be immensely appreciated . with regards rk _______________________________________________________ Too much spam in your inbox?

...9% 1024/ 4/ +20%/ +11% 1024/ 8/ +40%/ +18% 2048/ 1/ +108%/ +74% 2048/ 4/ +21%/ +7% 2048/ 8/ +32%/ +14% 4096/ 1/ +94%/ +77% 4096/ 4/ +7%/ -6% 4096/ 8/ +9%/ -4% 16384/ 1/ +33%/ +9% 16384/ 4/ +10%/ -6% 16384/ 8/ +19%/ +2% 65535/ 1/ +15%/ -6% 65535/ 4/ +8%/ -9% 65535/ 8/ +14%/ 0% Guest RX: size/session/+thu%/+normalize% 64/ 1/ -3%/ -3% 64/ 4/ +4%/ +20% 64/ 8/ -1%/ -1% 512/ 1/ +20%/ +12% 512/ 4/ +1%/ +3% 512/ 8/ 0%/ -5% 1024/ 1/ +9%/...

...9% 1024/ 4/ +20%/ +11% 1024/ 8/ +40%/ +18% 2048/ 1/ +108%/ +74% 2048/ 4/ +21%/ +7% 2048/ 8/ +32%/ +14% 4096/ 1/ +94%/ +77% 4096/ 4/ +7%/ -6% 4096/ 8/ +9%/ -4% 16384/ 1/ +33%/ +9% 16384/ 4/ +10%/ -6% 16384/ 8/ +19%/ +2% 65535/ 1/ +15%/ -6% 65535/ 4/ +8%/ -9% 65535/ 8/ +14%/ 0% Guest RX: size/session/+thu%/+normalize% 64/ 1/ -3%/ -3% 64/ 4/ +4%/ +20% 64/ 8/ -1%/ -1% 512/ 1/ +20%/ +12% 512/ 4/ +1%/ +3% 512/ 8/ 0%/ -5% 1024/ 1/ +9%/...

...39;m mistaken this type of information shouldn't be circulating on port 139? Here is the version of Samba: Samba version 3.4.9 Here is a sample of the trace from tcpdump: 17:46:35.838212 IP pdc-canix.xyzcivitas.com.netbios-ssn > GBY-PC-125.xyzcivitas.com.1026: Flags [P.], ack 123157, win 65535, length 1239 NBT Session Packet: Unknown packet type 0x38Data: (41 bytes) [000] D5 F1 4E 73 4E 02 00 00 FB 04 00 00 2E 00 00 00 \0xd5\0xf1NsN\0x02\0x00\0x00 \0xfb\0x04\0x00\0x00.\0x00\0x00\0x00 [010] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 64 40 43 32 32 30 \0x00\0x00\0x00\0x00\0x01\0x00\0x00\0x00 \0x...

...% 4096/2/+0.0098% -15.3094% +18.0885% 4096/4/+0.0445% -10.8247% +12.1886% 4096/8/-2.1317% -12.5111% +11.8637% 16384/1/-0.0008% -6.1891% +6.5966% 16384/2/-0.0117% -16.2716% +19.4198% 16384/4/+0.0001% -5.9197% +6.2923% 16384/8/+0.0173% -7.6681% +8.3236% 65535/1/+0.0011% -10.3594% +11.5578% 65535/2/-0.4108% -14.4304% +16.3838% 65535/4/+0.0011% -10.3594% +11.5578% 65535/8/-0.4108% -14.4304% +16.3838% Guest tx stream: size(B)/sessions/throughput/cpu/normalized thru/ 64/1/-0.6228% -2.1936% +1.6060% 64/2/+0.8646% -3.50...

...% 4096/2/+0.0098% -15.3094% +18.0885% 4096/4/+0.0445% -10.8247% +12.1886% 4096/8/-2.1317% -12.5111% +11.8637% 16384/1/-0.0008% -6.1891% +6.5966% 16384/2/-0.0117% -16.2716% +19.4198% 16384/4/+0.0001% -5.9197% +6.2923% 16384/8/+0.0173% -7.6681% +8.3236% 65535/1/+0.0011% -10.3594% +11.5578% 65535/2/-0.4108% -14.4304% +16.3838% 65535/4/+0.0011% -10.3594% +11.5578% 65535/8/-0.4108% -14.4304% +16.3838% Guest tx stream: size(B)/sessions/throughput/cpu/normalized thru/ 64/1/-0.6228% -2.1936% +1.6060% 64/2/+0.8646% -3.50...

Hi, I noticed that there are some diagnostics discrepancies between clang and gcc related to `__attribute__((constructor(n)))` and `__attribute__((destructor(n)))`. *[clang]* It seems priorities >65535 and <0 on ctor/dtor functions are ignored and are set back to default 65535 in clang and Clang only gives an error when > 32-bit unsigned value specified. *[g++]* g++ gives an error for any values <0 and >65535. I am wondering should we let Clang's diagnostics match g++ to make th...

...0 03600 divert 8668 ip from any to me in via bfe0 <antispoof rules, icmp restricts, internal interface allow, allow incuming keep-state connections to services> //here are defined queues 09600 queue 1 udp from me to any dst-port 53,123 out via bfe0 keep-state 09800 queue 2 tcp from any 1024-65535 to any out via bfe0 iptos lowdelay iplen 32-68 established 10000 queue 2 tcp from any 1024-65535 to any out via bfe0 iptos lowdelay established 10200 queue 2 tcp from any 1024-65535 to any out via bfe0 iptos lowdelay setup keep-state 10400 queue 3 tcp from any 1024-65535 to any dst-port 22,194,5190...

...--dport $HOST_PORT -j DNAT --to $GUEST_IP:$GUEST_PORT    fi fi Here’s my network XML <network>   <name>olympus</name>   <uuid>3b0d968c-8166-42f7-8109-e5f0317cab42</uuid>   <forward mode='nat'>     <nat>       <port start='1024' end='65535'/>     </nat>   </forward>   <bridge name='virbr1' stp='on' delay='0'/>   <mac address='52:54:00:bb:18:6b'/>   <ip address='10.128.10.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'>     <dhcp>       <range start='10.128.1...

Here's the output: Feb 9 15:51:26 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:0f:ea:73:88:12:00:40:2b:67:5b:a7:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.54 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=51248 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1964 DPT=139 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT (020405B401010402) Feb 9 15:51:28 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:0f:ea:73:88:12:00:12:3f:a1:fd:1b:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.61 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=2065 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1136 DPT=445 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT (020...

...12629 IP 10.213.132.83.64001 > dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh: P 53:105(52) ack 168 win 63936 03:09:50.312639 IP dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh > 10.213.132.83.64001: . ack 105 win 9648 03:09:50.342057 IP dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh > sudarshan-d01.odc.reconnex.net.57995: . ack 2081127296 win 65535 03:09:50.345756 IP sudarshan-d01.odc.reconnex.net.57995 > dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh: P 1:85(84) ack 0 win 65535 03:09:50.345768 IP dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh > sudarshan-d01.odc.reconnex.net.57995: . ack 85 win 65535 03:09:50.346134 IP dev-130.odc.reconnex.net.ssh > sudarshan-d01.odc....

...n Vektor der Gr??e 14.9 GB nicht allozieren >> Sys.setenv(LANGUAGE="en") >> y <- c(0L, -2e9:2e9) > Error: cannot allocate vector of size 14.9 Gb >> y <- -1e9:4e9 >> .Internal(inspect(y)) > @0x00000000195a6808 14 REALSXP g0c0 [REF(65535)] -1000000000 : -294967296 (compact) >> .Machine$integer.max / 1e9 > [1] 2.147484 >> y <- -1e6:2.2e9 >> .Internal(inspect(y)) > @0x000000000a11a5d8 14 REALSXP g0c0 [REF(65535)] -1000000 : -2094967296 (compact) >> y <- -1e6:2e9 >&g...

Rowland, OK. Should I delete these lines? diff yours mine 63d62 yours# -A ufw-after-logging-output -m limit --limit 3/min --limit-burst 10 -j LOG --log-prefix "[UFW ALLOW] " 85,87d83 yours# -A ufw-before-logging-forward -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m limit --limit 3/min --limit-burst 10 -j LOG --log-prefix "[UFW AUDIT] " yours# -A ufw-before-logging-input -m conntrack