search for: 650,18

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "650,18".

Did you mean: 650,10
2023 Aug 22
0
[PATCH v4 43/48] drm/ttm: introduce pool_shrink_rwsem
...ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG > extern int __printf(2, 3) shrinker_debugfs_rename(struct shrinker *shrinker, > const char *fmt, ...); > diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c > index 3ab301ff122d..a27779ed3798 100644 > --- a/mm/shrinker.c > +++ b/mm/shrinker.c > @@ -650,18 +650,3 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker) > kfree(shrinker); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_free); > - > -/** > - * synchronize_shrinkers - Wait for all running shrinkers to complete. > - * > - * This is equivalent to calling unregister_shrink() and re...
2019 Sep 26
0
[PATCH net v2] vsock: Fix a lockdep warning in __vsock_release()
...L_GPL(__vsock_create); > > -static void __vsock_release(struct sock *sk) > +static void __vsock_release(struct sock *sk, int level) > { > + WARN_ON(level != 1 && level != 2); > + > if (sk) { > struct sk_buff *skb; > struct sock *pending; > @@ -648,9 +650,18 @@ static void __vsock_release(struct sock *sk) > vsk = vsock_sk(sk); > pending = NULL; /* Compiler warning. */ > > + /* The release call is supposed to use lock_sock_nested() > + * rather than lock_sock(), if a sock lock should be acquired. > + */ > transpor...
2020 Feb 11
0
[PATCH 08/62] x86/boot/compressed/64: Add IDT Infrastructure
...ip) + /* * Clear BSS (stack is currently empty) */ @@ -475,6 +490,13 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(.Lrelocated) shrq $3, %rcx rep stosq +/* + * Load stage2 IDT + */ + pushq %rsi + call load_stage2_idt + popq %rsi + /* * Do the extraction, and jump to the new kernel.. */ @@ -628,6 +650,18 @@ SYM_DATA_START_LOCAL(gdt) .quad 0x0000000000000000 /* TS continued */ SYM_DATA_END_LABEL(gdt, SYM_L_LOCAL, gdt_end) +SYM_DATA_START(boot_idt_desc) + .word boot_idt_end - boot_idt + .quad 0 +SYM_DATA_END(boot_idt_desc) + .balign 8 +SYM_DATA_START(boot_idt) + .rept BOOT_IDT_ENTRIES + .qu...
2019 Jul 24
20
[PATCH 00/12] block/bio, fs: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> Hi, This is mostly Jerome's work, converting the block/bio and related areas to call put_user_page*() instead of put_page(). Because I've changed Jerome's patches, in some cases significantly, I'd like to get his feedback before we actually leave him listed as the author (he might want to disown some or all of these). I added a
2019 Jul 24
20
[PATCH 00/12] block/bio, fs: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> Hi, This is mostly Jerome's work, converting the block/bio and related areas to call put_user_page*() instead of put_page(). Because I've changed Jerome's patches, in some cases significantly, I'd like to get his feedback before we actually leave him listed as the author (he might want to disown some or all of these). I added a
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.