search for: 64xx

Hi all, I am new to asterisk, but experienced with Linux and Avaya/Lucent G3R hardware/software. We currently have a large inventory of spare Lucent 64XX phone sets. I'm considering setting up an asterisk system for a remote office, and would like to use the Lucent sets because they are cheap, and familiar to my end users. Does anyone know of a card that can drive these sets? I think the underlying protocol is ISDN. Thanks in advance. -...

I have two servers setup to do DUNDi lookups against each other. The scenario is that on server A, I have a wildcard match for extensions 64XX that rings to a local extension on the server. On server B I have a 6442 real extension that I would like to have ring if called. It seems that DUNDi is matching on the 64XX and not searching out to see if there is a *more* exact match than the pattern match. Is there any way to get around this?...

Hello I do have problem using Linux with an external HP tape drive. The server platform is also an HP Server; the server is an HP ML350 G4, and the Tape drive is a HP Storage Works Ultrium 448 - 1U Rack-mountable. HP Ultrium documentation says two drivers should be automatically up, sym53c8xx for LSI SCSI interface "st" for tape and /proc/scsi/scsi should contain information about

First, let me say that I think the speex code is incredible in the way it supports floating and fixed point code from one set of code. The same is true for supporting multiple processors, etc... I've used speex with the PC, TI 64xx and 55xx. Please view the following comments not as an attack on speex (which I think is incredible!) but as my contribution to an open source project. I know this is a minor point, but speex/AEC fixed point could use a few improvements shifting 2's complement values. I realize these things...

...ement. The DSP functions are performing as I expect: SP AutoCorrelation: (nx/2) * nr + (nr/2) * 5 + 10 - (nr * nr)/4 + nr SP FIR Filter: 4*floor((nh-1)/2)+14)*(ceil(nr/4)) + 8 SP Inner product: nx/2 + 25 But unless the whole algorithm gets down near 10MIPS, I'm going to have to go to the 64xx fixed point. Jerry J. Trantow Applied Signal Processing, Inc. jtrantow@ieee.org -----Original Message----- From: Jim Crichton [mailto:jim.crichton@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:33 AM To: Jerry Trantow Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] TI 6xxx platform performanc...

...faster. That's because some of the float ops get replaced by several int ops. > Does this make sense? > I'm generating floating point code, using the optimizer, etc... Are you sure the compiler isn't using float emulation or something like that? > Has anyone posted DM642, C64xx or C67xx benchmarks? I'm not aware of any. Jean-Marc

You might not be doing anything wrong. Speex is stateful and can get into a bad state sometimes. It's happened to me too, but not recently. And I've seen such bugs reported on this list and fixed. I suggest several approaches to solving the problem: 1) Try compiling Speex without compiler optimizations and see if the problem still occurs. Most likely it will, but this is an