search for: 64tb

...mended minimum amount of RAM be, to run Centos 7. >> 16GB??? >> > > > Jay, it helps us help you when you give more information. > > I have CentOS 7 running happily on 4GB. My presumption - based on > experience, extrapolation, and google - is that it will also run with 64TB. > > Anything between those numbers should be good. > > Cheers > L. L, The use of this machine would be as a home server running as a web and email server, two users, light use. My current server has 4GB, but I'm thinking of getting a new box and if I can afford it, figured I...

...n incredibly hard time finding any documentation on filesystem size limits for samba on 64bit linux with 2.6 kernel exporting to 32bit windows 2003 and windows-xp by googling. The closest I could get to was that cifs filesystem size correlates to ntfs filesystem size and therefore there would be a 64TB limit. Are there additional limits within the software stack that I should be aware of? We are considering exporting a 40TB xfs filesystem striped over 20 2TB luns on a fibre channel SAN via LVM2 on SLES9-SP3, and will be falling back to 16TB filesystems if necessary. Anything below that would be...

A few years ago, I vaguely recall some issue with RHEL needing a special license or something like that, if you had more than a certain amount of CPU's or a certain amount of RAM. Does Centos work fine for 2 CPU's, 16 cores, 32 threads, and 256 G of ram? Centos6 specifically.

Hello, What would the recommended minimum amount of RAM be, to run Centos 7. 16GB??? Thanks, Jay

...llo, > > What would the recommended minimum amount of RAM be, to run Centos 7. > 16GB??? > Jay, it helps us help you when you give more information. I have CentOS 7 running happily on 4GB. My presumption - based on experience, extrapolation, and google - is that it will also run with 64TB. Anything between those numbers should be good. Cheers L. ------ "The antidote to apocalypticism is *apocalyptic civics*. Apocalyptic civics is the insistence that we cannot ignore the truth, nor should we panic about it. It is a shared consciousness that our institutions have failed and ou...

Suppose I start building nodes with (say) 24 drives each in them. Would the standard/recommended approach be to make each drive its own filesystem, and export 24 separate bricks, server1:/data1 .. server1:/data24 ? Making a distributed replicated volume between this and another server would then have to list all 48 drives individually. At the other extreme, I could put all 24 drives into some