search for: 64m

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 315 matches for "64m".

Did you mean: 64
2002 Oct 03
1
kjournald tuning
...535 apache 16 0 16756 16M 11700 R 2.3 2.1 0:46 httpd 3151 apache 15 0 17644 17M 11588 R 1.7 2.2 1:16 httpd 3373 apache 16 0 16772 16M 11704 R 1.7 2.1 0:57 httpd 3174 apache 16 0 17632 17M 11608 R 1.5 2.2 1:12 httpd 3214 mysql 16 0 84056 64M 2652 R 1.4 8.5 0:07 mysqld-max 3479 apache 15 0 17608 17M 11612 R 1.4 2.2 0:51 httpd 3152 mysql 15 0 84056 64M 2652 R 1.0 8.5 0:08 mysqld-max 3215 apache 16 0 17636 17M 11588 R 1.0 2.2 1:08 httpd 3477 mysql 16 0 84056 64M 2652 R 1.0...
2019 Sep 12
2
Fw: Btrfs Samba and Quotas
Hello Hendrik Can you help input 2 commands 'mount' and 'df -TPh' on OMV, and post the output to us, thank you. -- Regards, Jones Syue | ??? QNAP Systems, Inc.
2018 Feb 27
1
On sharded tiered volume, only first shard of new file goes on hot tier.
...ring helps mitigate. This problem occurs in GlusterFS 3.7.18 and 3.12.3, at least. I/O size doesn't make any difference, I tried multiple sizes. I didn't find any volume configuration options that helped in getting all of the new shards to go directly to the hot tier. # dd if=/dev/root bs=64M of=/samba/tiered-sharded-vol/file-1 count=6 402653184 bytes (403 MB) copied, 1.31154 s, 307 MB/s # ls -lrtdh /samba/tiered-sharded-vol/* /exports/brick-*/tiered-sharded-vol/* /exports/brick-*/tiered-sharded-vol/.shard/* 2>/dev/null ---------T 0 Feb 27 08:58 /exports/brick-cold/tiered-sharded-...
2019 Sep 12
0
Fw: Btrfs Samba and Quotas
...ext4 2,7T 2,6T 7,6G 100% /media/1e9433cd-993d-4af7-9114-fb761bccdbbf shm tmpfs 64M 0 64M 0% /sharedfolders/docker_dir/containers/526de341bb066357f7bc96acd5af2a190bb2735e6e055dd64d20128a5f409a5d/mounts/shm shm...
2012 Jan 15
0
[CENTOS6] mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value - during server startup
...hable 7 base 430000000 mask FF0000000 uncachable 8 disabled 9 disabled x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106 original variable MTRRs reg 0, base: 0GB, range: 16GB, type WB reg 1, base: 16GB, range: 1GB, type WB reg 2, base: 3256MB, range: 8MB, type UC reg 3, base: 3264MB, range: 64MB, type UC reg 4, base: 3328MB, range: 256MB, type UC reg 5, base: 3584MB, range: 512MB, type UC reg 6, base: 17150MB, range: 2MB, type UC reg 7, base: 17152MB, range: 256MB, type UC total RAM covered: 16310M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 64K num_reg: 10 lose cover RA...
2005 Oct 10
2
centos on 64M 350Mhz pentimum II
All, I have an old computer 64M 350Mhz pentium II. centos os 4.1 installs on it fine. however on boot it says low memory and it kills certain processes. httpd or sendmail. I have a 2GIG swap and I did a chkconfig XXX off on a few things like xfs, nfs, httpd, kudzu. My old 2.4 kernel used to run in 4M with a swap... I had recom...
2008 Nov 25
3
Xen Balooning "Minimum target"
...: 237568 kB Requested target: 237568 kB Minimum target: 237568 kB Maximum target: 1048576 kB Low-mem balloon: 804352 kB High-mem balloon: 0 kB Driver pages: 1024 kB Xen hard limit: ??? kB I can set the memory up to 1024M, but if i set the memory to 64M, than i won''t remove the memory in the guest, but xm list shows: tsles 6 64 1 -b---- 24.2 --long output: (maxmem 1024) (memory 64) (shadow_memory 0) so, what is the reason? cu denny _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-us...
2012 Nov 03
0
mtrr_gran_size and mtrr_chunk_size
...cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106 original variable MTRRs reg 0, base: 0GB, range: 16GB, type WB reg 1, base: 16GB, range: 1GB, type WB reg 2, base: 17GB, range: 256MB, type WB reg 3, base: 3GB, range: 1GB, type UC reg 4, base: 2816MB, range: 256MB, type UC reg 5, base: 2752MB, range: 64MB, type UC reg 6, base: 2736MB, range: 16MB, type UC reg 7, base: 17656MB, range: 8MB, type UC total RAM covered: 16296M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 64K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 128K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 64K chun...
2012 Apr 12
1
6.2 x86_64 "mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value"
...pr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 512K num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4865M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 1M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4865M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 2M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4864M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 4M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4864M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 8M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4864M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 16M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 0...
2007 Nov 09
6
backups and md5 all in one while splitting
...ip2 |tee dump.bz2 | md5sum >dump.md5 The problem is I need to split the backups, so this doesn't really work. Is there perhaps another way of piping things to allow for splitting of the backups? Currently I'm doing something like this svnadmin dump --deltas /repo |bzip2 |split - -b 64m cat *.bz2* | md5sum >dump.md5 Is there a way to do this all in one step? Russ
2009 Sep 09
10
dtrace overhead and proper measuring technique
I''m trying to time a function within Firefoxwith a pid$target probe [2]. e.g dtrace -Zqw -x dynvarsize=64m -x evaltime=preinit -p 13954 -s menu- construct.d -s sigcont.d elapsed: 12.7942481ms cpu : 7.7911194ms count : 40 times I''m also measuring Firefox startup time by running it arguments like this: ... file:///Users/joelr/work/mozilla/startup/startup.html#`python -c ''impo...
2019 Jul 05
2
Re: [nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:48-0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 7/5/19 8:21 AM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:04-0500, Eric Blake wrote: > >> On 7/4/19 1:38 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > >>> In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared. > >>> The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the > >>> size by a factor of around 10000. > >> > >> Odd that you are only seeing this for the nozero filter, since we also &g...
2019 Jul 05
2
Re: [nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:04-0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 7/4/19 1:38 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared. > > The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the > > size by a factor of around 10000. > > Odd that you are only seeing this for the nozero filter, since we also > have the same sort of buffer i...
2020 Jun 10
0
Re: [PATCH virt-v2v] v2v: Allow temporary directory to be set on a global basis.
...Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on overlay 40G 17G 24G 41% / tmpfs 64M 0 64M 0% /dev tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup shm 64M 0 64M 0%...
2007 Jun 14
3
Two problems
Hello, I have two problems: 1) Identify my card 2) Error message at dumping 1) It seems to me that I have a special version of the GeForce4 420 Go 32M because my card is a GeForce4 440 Go 64M but both have the same PCI device id. Is this important for the development of the renouveau driver or is this already noted? Outputs: lspci [...] 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 440 Go 64M] (rev a3) lspci -n [...] 01:00.0 0300: 10de:0179 (rev a3) System:...
2004 Aug 06
0
̨Íåºê´ó¹ú¼ÊÉÌó³ÏÑ°¹óµØºÏ×÷»ï°é£¬ÏúÊÛµçÄÔÅä¼þ¡¢ÊÖ»ú¡¢±Ê¼Ç±¾µçÄÔ ÁªÏµÈË:³ÂÊÀ½Ü µç»°:013850704389
..." 400 WD800BB 80G/UDMA 100/2M/7200rpm/IDE/3.5" 430 WD1000BB 100G/UDMA 100/2M/7200rpm/IDE/3.5´ç 750 WD1000 100G/UDMA 100/8M/7200rpm/IDE/3.5" 900 WD1200BB 120G/UDMA 100/2M/7200rpm/IDE/3.5" 700 WD1200 120G/UDMA 100/8M/7200rpm/IDE/3.5" 750 Îå¡¢Hy ÄÚ´æ 64M 7ns/168PIN SDRAM/PC-133 28 128M 7ns/168PIN SDRAM/PC133 50 256M 7ns/168PIN SDRAM/PC133 95 128M DDR 184PIN DDR RAM/Ô­³§ÄÚ´æ 53 256M DDR 184PIN DDR RAM/Ô­³§ÄÚ´æ 100 Kingmax 128M 7ns/168PIN SDRAM/PC-150 60 256M 7ns/168PIN SDRAM/PC150 130 128M DDR333 168PIN DDR RAM...
2019 Jul 04
3
[nbdkit] [filter/nozero] large binary size with GCC 9
Hi all, It seems GCC 9 does not put read-only zero-initialized variables into the BSS section anymore; instead it is put into RODATA. (See the thread at [0], especially [1]) In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared. The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the size by a factor of around 10000. (Clang 8 and older GCCs work "correctly") It would be possible to remove the "const" qualifier or use some compiler...
2012 May 03
1
File size diff on local disk vs NFS share
On May 3, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Cooper wrote: >>>> I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is >>>> showing 64M in size, but when copying the file to a local drive, it >>>> shows 2.5MB in size. >>>> >>>> My NFS server is hardware Raided with a volume stripe size of 128K >>>> were the volume size is 20TB, my local disk is about 500GB. >>>> >>...
1999 Jun 06
2
problem in make for R-devel and R-release
Hello, I just got R-devel june3. My machine is SuSE linux 6.1 pent2 with 64M Ram. Configure goes well, but make stops and complains install-sh is not found in tools. There is no "tools" directory! After looking around I found that "aux" has those files and did sym link. Make worked. The same problem is also present the R-release bundle. Cheers, Osman...
2008 Jul 11
1
dovecot.index.cache File too large
...mxhost deliver(user1): pwrite() failed: File too large Jul 11 12:07:32 mxhost deliver(user1): file_set_size() failed with index cache file /mail/user1/Maildir/.parser/dovecot.index.cache: File too large mxhost# ls -lh /mail/user1/Maildir/.parser/dovecot.index.cache -rw------- 1 user1 emails 64M Jul 11 10:01 /mail/user1/Maildir/.parser/dovecot.index.cache mxhost# cd /mail/user1/Maildir/.parser/ mxhost# ls -l new/ | wc -l 1016 mxhost# ls -l cur | wc -l 132342 What can I do to get rid of this error? Best regards, p.