Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "64d53f7d".
2013 Nov 11
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> writes:
> Nothing. And adding a note to the release won't make it come faster
> "just because". I think it's perfectly reasonable to wait a few month
> in 3.5 trunk for every one to accommodate.
Just to be clear, that should be a few months from the time the new
required toolchain versions are posted on the web site. An
2013 Nov 08
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On 8 November 2013 08:49, <dag at cray.com> wrote:
> This is a *serious* issue. It doesn't seem like people really
> comprehend the challenges of upgrading toolchains in large software
> projects. We're talking about millions and millions of lines of code
> spread out over many independent modules. These all have to fit
> together to create a usable tool.
>
I
2013 Nov 11
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...en into essentially all of the recent releases I've
checked. I've not heard any objections to these versions with specific
problems they present.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131111/64d53f7d/attachment.html>