Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "640kbit".
Did you mean:
600kbit
2003 Dec 03
12
$100 USD to the first person that can provide the rules/scripts that will solve the QOS latency & bandwidth allocation issue !!!!
To stress the urgency and importance of my questions, I am willing to
pay $100 to the first person that can provide me with the scripts/ rules
that will work in my SnapGear firewalls that will solve the problems I
am having.
Please see the following post:
Linux QOS and prioritization of real-time data (RTP/VoIP)
Thank you!
2005 Mar 15
1
Traffic Shaping multiple incoming broadband sources?
...parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 1350kbit quantum 1500
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x03 fw flowid 1:2
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:210 htb rate 168kbit ceil 224kbit prio 1 quantum 1500
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:220 htb rate 362kbit ceil 640kbit prio 2 quantum 1500
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:230 htb rate 640kbit ceil 960kbit prio 3 quantum 1500
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:240 htb rate 180kbit ceil 240kbit prio 4 quantum 1500
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:210 handle 210: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev eth0 p...
2004 Apr 06
0
hashing rule don''t match
...03.0/24
hashkey mask 0x000000FF at 12 link 1:
but i want 2 hashkey for 80.97.103.0/24 and for 81.180.12.0/24 can
somebody help me ?
this is a part fo my script
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 1 r2q 1
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 640Kbit ceil 640Kbit
prio 0
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:201 htb rate 1Kbit ceil 64Kbit
prio 7 quantum 1500
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:202 htb rate 1Kbit ceil 64Kbit
prio 7 quantum 1500
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:203 htb rate 1Kbit ceil 64Kbit
prio 7 quantum 15...
2004 Nov 19
2
HTB&IMQ
...lass add dev imq1 parent 1:20 classid 1:2010 htb rate 64Kbit ceil 1024Kbit
tc qdisc add dev imq1 parent 1:2010 handle 2010 sfq
tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 200 handle 2010 fw
classid 1:2010
# 8k max 80k
tc class add dev imq1 parent 1:20 classid 1:2020 htb rate 64Kbit ceil 640Kbit
tc qdisc add dev imq1 parent 1:2020 handle 2020 sfq
tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 200 handle 2020 fw
classid 1:2020
# IP 192.168.50.0/24
#DOWNLOAD
#192K mark 2000
#iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -d 192.168.50.40 -j MARK --set-mark 2000
#128k mark 2010
iptables -...
2006 Mar 21
0
WWW burst
I''m admin of 50 clients. I have a 800/640kbit internet connection.
Could you help me a shaper witch would load websites very fast.
I know that i need to use burst, but thats all :(
i''m using www.eranetas.com/gg/DAY shaper.
<--------------------===================================-------------------->
DELFI mail pašto...
2006 Apr 07
9
u32 and iptables do not work together
Hello all,
I am trying to make a filter into my QoS rules and I founded that
when I try to use filters u32 and with fwmark they do not work together.
This is the filter I use, just and example, for u32:
$TC filter add dev $DL parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip sport
22 0xffff flowid 1:10
This is working fine. Now if I try to mark a package that I want it
to go to the same
2006 May 19
25
iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working?
I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in
the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I
match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this
does not seem to work:
wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
2005 Mar 16
9
IAX Registration being lost
Please check the Wiki (www.voip-info.org) and the list archive by
Googling site:lists.digium.com <search string>
Also, please include some more info. That is probably why you got no
answer...
Is your machine sitting behind a router or is it directly connected to
your broadband (assuming)?
If the machine is behind a firewall, the IP change should not be so
profound.
It would just take a