search for: 640kbit

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "640kbit".

Did you mean: 600kbit
2003 Dec 03
12
$100 USD to the first person that can provide the rules/scripts that will solve the QOS latency & bandwidth allocation issue !!!!
To stress the urgency and importance of my questions, I am willing to pay $100 to the first person that can provide me with the scripts/ rules that will work in my SnapGear firewalls that will solve the problems I am having. Please see the following post: Linux QOS and prioritization of real-time data (RTP/VoIP) Thank you!
2005 Mar 15
1
Traffic Shaping multiple incoming broadband sources?
...parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 1350kbit quantum 1500 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 handle 0x03 fw flowid 1:2 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:210 htb rate 168kbit ceil 224kbit prio 1 quantum 1500 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:220 htb rate 362kbit ceil 640kbit prio 2 quantum 1500 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:230 htb rate 640kbit ceil 960kbit prio 3 quantum 1500 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:240 htb rate 180kbit ceil 240kbit prio 4 quantum 1500 tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:210 handle 210: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth0 p...
2004 Apr 06
0
hashing rule don''t match
...03.0/24 hashkey mask 0x000000FF at 12 link 1: but i want 2 hashkey for 80.97.103.0/24 and for 81.180.12.0/24 can somebody help me ? this is a part fo my script tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 1 r2q 1 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 640Kbit ceil 640Kbit prio 0 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:201 htb rate 1Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 7 quantum 1500 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:202 htb rate 1Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 7 quantum 1500 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:203 htb rate 1Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 7 quantum 15...
2004 Nov 19
2
HTB&IMQ
...lass add dev imq1 parent 1:20 classid 1:2010 htb rate 64Kbit ceil 1024Kbit tc qdisc add dev imq1 parent 1:2010 handle 2010 sfq tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 200 handle 2010 fw classid 1:2010 # 8k max 80k tc class add dev imq1 parent 1:20 classid 1:2020 htb rate 64Kbit ceil 640Kbit tc qdisc add dev imq1 parent 1:2020 handle 2020 sfq tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 200 handle 2020 fw classid 1:2020 # IP 192.168.50.0/24 #DOWNLOAD #192K mark 2000 #iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -d 192.168.50.40 -j MARK --set-mark 2000 #128k mark 2010 iptables -...
2006 Mar 21
0
WWW burst
I''m admin of 50 clients. I have a 800/640kbit internet connection. Could you help me a shaper witch would load websites very fast. I know that i need to use burst, but thats all :( i''m using www.eranetas.com/gg/DAY shaper. <--------------------===================================--------------------> DELFI mail pašto...
2006 Apr 07
9
u32 and iptables do not work together
Hello all, I am trying to make a filter into my QoS rules and I founded that when I try to use filters u32 and with fwmark they do not work together. This is the filter I use, just and example, for u32: $TC filter add dev $DL parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip sport 22 0xffff flowid 1:10 This is working fine. Now if I try to mark a package that I want it to go to the same
2006 May 19
25
iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working?
I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this does not seem to work: wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
2005 Mar 16
9
IAX Registration being lost
Please check the Wiki (www.voip-info.org) and the list archive by Googling site:lists.digium.com <search string> Also, please include some more info. That is probably why you got no answer... Is your machine sitting behind a router or is it directly connected to your broadband (assuming)? If the machine is behind a firewall, the IP change should not be so profound. It would just take a