search for: 6401

...sterisk which is connected to avaya definity. I set trunk to overlap. When I call to this trunk (so called tac in avaya) without any number I hear dial tone for some time, any digit I try to dial are ignored by asterisk- still tone, then call is rejected: -- Accepting overlap call from '6401' to '<unspecified>' on channel 0/9, span 3 -- Starting simple switch on 'DAHDI/i3/6401-f' -- Going to extension s|1 because of empty extension received on overlap call -- Hungup 'DAHDI/i3/6401-f' on avaya side it looks like: 16:28:51 dial 8...

Hi,all What version of dovecot supports master users? Master users means as follows https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/MasterUsers -- ???????????????????????????? ?????????????? ??? ??????????????? ?? ?? ?106-0047 ??????????? 12 ? 3 ? ?????? TEL?03-6401-5314 (??) 03-6401-5117 (???) URL?http://www.sios.com/ ?SIOS???????????????????????????? (SIOS Technology)?http://www.facebook.com/SIOSTechnology (OSS??????)?http://www.facebook.com/OSSyorozu ?Twitter???????? https://twitter.com/#!/SIOS_Technology ????????????????????????????

...ey are being run and get the results and side-effects. Thanks, Reed -- Reed A. Cartwright, PhD Associate Professor of Genomics, Evolution, and Bioinformatics School of Life Sciences and The Biodesign Institute Arizona State University ================== Address: The Biodesign Institute, PO Box 876401, Tempe, AZ 85287-6401 USA Packages: The Biodesign Institute, 1001 S. McAllister Ave, Tempe, AZ 85287-6401 USA Office: Biodesign B-220C, 1-480-965-9949 Website: http://cartwrig.ht/

...s how to get this to work, I would appreciate the help. Thanks, Reed -- Reed A. Cartwright, PhD Associate Professor of Genomics, Evolution, and Bioinformatics School of Life Sciences and The Biodesign Institute Arizona State University ================== Address: The Biodesign Institute, PO Box 876401, Tempe, AZ 85287-6401 USA Packages: The Biodesign Institute, 1001 S. McAllister Ave, Tempe, AZ 85287-6401 USA Office: Biodesign B-220C, 1-480-965-9949 Website: http://cartwrig.ht/

Hi, I have installed debian 3.1 on an Intel Pentium D processor 920 ( including vanderpool.) The installation worked fine and i''m able to start guest-domains. When I try to start the 5.th Guest-Domain, I Get the following error: Error: Device 769 (vbd) could not be connected. Backend device not found. this problem exists still if i have shutdown or destroyed all guests, after

...;SIP0gss' priority 1 to park-dial (0x2aaaacca2050) == Timeout for SIP/localhost-cc002cf8 parked on 701 (default). Returning to park-dial,SIP0gss,1 -- Executing [SIP0gss at park-dial:1] Dial("SIP/localhost-cc002cf8", "SIP/gss|30|") in new stack [Jul 1 01:54:56] WARNING[6401]: pbx.c:953 pbx_exec: The application delimiter is now the comma, not the pipe. Did you forget to convert your dialplan? (Dial(SIP/gss|30|)) == Using SIP RTP TOS bits 176 == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 [Jul 1 01:54:57] WARNING[6401]: chan_sip.c:4526 create_addr: No such host: gss|30| [Jul 1 01...

...ctures - www.rsp.com.au redefining visual effects delivery --------------------------------------------------------------- address level 1 / 133 gouger street adelaide south australia 5000 ---------------------------------------------------------------   adelaide ph +61 8 8400 6400 fax +61 8 8400 6401 sydney   ph +61 2 9338 6400 fax +61 2 9338 6401 --------------------------------------------------------------- rising sun research - http://research.rsp.com.au --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list X...

Hi If I add a specific machine to my hosts allow list in the global section of my smb.conf, then that machine can access any of the shares on that server. If I only add the machine to a hosts allow list in a specific share, when I try and connect to that share from that machine I get an error : 'Specified computer did not recieve your request' and in log.smb : 'Connection denied from

...erything is working as it should, all the shares work, with my users connecting with unames and passwords from the pw-server in the config. BUT: My syslog is getting constantly spammed with this errormessage (cluttering :) , and i haven't been able to find out why: May 22 09:51:00 gibson smbd[6401]: unable to open passdb database. May 22 09:51:00 gibson smbd[6401]: [2003/05/22 09:51:00, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwnam(1367) Is the errormessage caused by missing smbpasswd file = I'm not using smbpassword file, password server is specified in config. Here's my smb.conf: [g...

I'm reposting this problem (perhaps a bug) now I've got more information on it. This is another point of view of the situation and I hope someone could have run into the same trouble before (and solved it :-)) This is it: * with ntbackup 2000 I create a 22Gb .bkf file in the windows machine. * I can copy that file over a samba share and get correct info form the file in windows

...er page "none" to job 4. I [04/Feb/2007:20:33:06 -0800] Job 4 queued on 'Lexmark' by 'root'. I [04/Feb/2007:20:33:06 -0800] Started filter /usr/lib/cups/filter/pstops (PID 6400) for job 4. I [04/Feb/2007:20:33:06 -0800] Started filter /usr/lib/cups/filter/foomatic-rip (PID 6401) for job 4. E [04/Feb/2007:20:33:06 -0800] PID 6401 stopped with status 1! I [04/Feb/2007:20:33:06 -0800] Hint: Try setting the LogLevel to "debug" to find out more. I [04/Feb/2007:20:33:06 -0800] Saving printers.conf... If I look with "lpq" I find: Lexmark is not ready Rank...

...1 root root 9687 May 13 06:14 rlprivate.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1385 May 13 06:14 rlshell.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2789 May 13 06:14 rltypedefs.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1751 May 13 06:14 sql_common.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6401 May 13 06:14 sql_state.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1055 May 13 06:14 sslopt-case.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1883 May 13 06:14 sslopt-longopts.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 970 May 13 06:14 sslopt-vars.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3022 May 13 06:14 tild...

...je 66c5 <zs_compact+0x57a> > 63ec: 48 83 e0 fe and $0xfffffffffffffffe,%rax > 63f0: bf 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edi > 63f5: 48 89 85 b0 fe ff ff mov %rax,-0x150(%rbp) > 63fc: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 6401 <zs_compact+0x2b6> > 6401: 48 8b 85 b0 fe ff ff mov -0x150(%rbp),%rax RAX: 2065676162726166 so rax is totally garbage, I think. It means obj_to_head returns garbage because get_first_obj_offset is utter crab because (page_idx / class->pages_per_zspage) was totally wrong...

...je 66c5 <zs_compact+0x57a> > 63ec: 48 83 e0 fe and $0xfffffffffffffffe,%rax > 63f0: bf 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edi > 63f5: 48 89 85 b0 fe ff ff mov %rax,-0x150(%rbp) > 63fc: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 6401 <zs_compact+0x2b6> > 6401: 48 8b 85 b0 fe ff ff mov -0x150(%rbp),%rax RAX: 2065676162726166 so rax is totally garbage, I think. It means obj_to_head returns garbage because get_first_obj_offset is utter crab because (page_idx / class->pages_per_zspage) was totally wrong...

Hi Sergey, On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:59:09PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello Minchan, > > -next 4.7.0-rc3-next-20160614 > > > [ 315.146533] kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled > [ 315.146538] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access > [ 315.146546] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN > [ 315.146576] Modules

Hi Sergey, On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:59:09PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello Minchan, > > -next 4.7.0-rc3-next-20160614 > > > [ 315.146533] kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled > [ 315.146538] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access > [ 315.146546] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN > [ 315.146576] Modules

On Feb 21, 2010, at 4:10 PM, S3 wrote: > > Why is there a default target? > Why can't those optimizations just be skipped until there is one? > (To be clear: I am assuming there is a reason for this. > I am asking what it is.) This has recently been fixed on trunk. The opt tool no longer adds a default target if a Module has no target attributes, and the optimizers now know

Hi all, I got a segmentation fault in compiz and after some analysis have a question about synchronization in core compiz functions.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Currently, if you have BitCode that does not specify a target, it gets a default architecture. This is especially odd if you are doing llvm-ld -native but it first applies optimizations for a target other than what it is currently compiling for. Ideally, target-specific optimizations wouldn't be applied until a target was given. This would allow

...84 d9 02 00 00 je 66c5 <zs_compact+0x57a> 63ec: 48 83 e0 fe and $0xfffffffffffffffe,%rax 63f0: bf 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edi 63f5: 48 89 85 b0 fe ff ff mov %rax,-0x150(%rbp) 63fc: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 6401 <zs_compact+0x2b6> 6401: 48 8b 85 b0 fe ff ff mov -0x150(%rbp),%rax ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 6408: f0 0f ba 28 00 lock btsl $0x0,(%rax) 640d: 0f 82 98 02 00 00 jb 66ab <zs_compact+0x560> 6413: 48 8b 85 10 fe...