search for: 63fa6dc9

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "63fa6dc9".

Did you mean: 63ba6dc7
2014 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: How to represent SEH (__try / __except) in LLVM IR
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Vadim Chugunov <vadimcn at gmail.com> wrote: > >> If we added unwind target to every potentially throwing instruction >> (loads, stores, all binary operations), wouldn't all such instructions have >> to become BB terminators? I'd expect that CFG