Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "63c6442d".
2014 Jun 25
0
Alleged bug in Silk codec
...single 16x16->32 with a 64-bit accumulator (SMLALBB). I would think a 64-bit version could be made pretty fast on 32-bit ARM, without even resorting to SIMD.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20140625/63c6442d/attachment.htm
2014 Jun 20
2
Alleged bug in Silk codec
Yes those instructions exist, although they're a bit slower than the basic
16x16->32 with 32-bit accumulation (SMLABB). So I'd be surprised if the
function with 64 bit accumulation would run as fast as the current code.
Don't know how much we care about 16-bit platforms. And accuracy should
not matter.
On the other hand, a 64-bit implementation is much cleaner/shorter, which
is