search for: 63b79e8

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "63b79e8".

Did you mean: 163f79e8
2018 Jul 16
0
[PATCH net-next V2 6/8] vhost: packed ring support
...&fixup) != sizeof num_buffers) { vq_err(vq, "Failed num_buffers write"); - vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, headcount); + vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, used, 1); goto out; } nvq->done_idx += headcount; diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index 060a431..63b79e8 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -323,6 +323,9 @@ static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev, vhost_reset_is_le(vq); vhost_disable_cross_endian(vq); vq->busyloop_timeout = 0; + vq->last_used_wrap_counter = true; + vq->last_avail_wrap_counter = t...
2018 Jul 16
11
[PATCH net-next V2 0/8] Packed virtqueue support for vhost
Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's guest driver series at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/942297/ Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test
2018 Jul 16
11
[PATCH net-next V2 0/8] Packed virtqueue support for vhost
Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's guest driver series at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/942297/ Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test