search for: 63b

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "63b".

Did you mean: 631
2025 Jun 03
1
Users unable to reset passwords
...change a strong password, users choose weaker and weaker > passwords that comply with policy until you are left with weak > passwords like P at ssword1. > > If you are interested in the science, then read Peter Gutmann's > Engineering Security (Chapter 7 PASSWORDS) or NIST SP800-63b, Digital > Identity Guidelines. Gutmann's book is particularly well cited with > security and usability studies, and it dispels all the myths, like > password rotation and complexity. > > Jeff [snip] I 110% agree with you! Unfortunately, this is "policy" beyond my con...
2004 Oct 21
2
how to read the stats
...08 bytes 69886 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 302bit 1pps lended: 68718 borrowed: 1168 giants: 0 tokens: -149248 ctokens: -73584 >>>> this is the low bandwidth class (bittorrent etc) class htb 1:30 parent 1:1 leaf 30: prio 3 quantum 8 rate 25Kbit ceil 51Kbit burst 63b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 47b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 495316458 bytes 541852 pkts (dropped 9303, overlimits 0 requeues 0) >>> THIS is the line I have problems understanding >>> I read it as 6190bit/sec which seems to be way lower than the 25Kbit >>> set for...
2025 Jun 03
1
Users unable to reset passwords
...n users every quarter to change a strong password, users choose weaker and weaker passwords that comply with policy until you are left with weak passwords like P at ssword1. If you are interested in the science, then read Peter Gutmann's Engineering Security (Chapter 7 PASSWORDS) or NIST SP800-63b, Digital Identity Guidelines. Gutmann's book is particularly well cited with security and usability studies, and it dispels all the myths, like password rotation and complexity. > As to Debian (if you've read this far), I really don't suspect Slackware as > being the problem here...
2019 Aug 17
2
Samba related question??
Somewhat Samba related, I ask this question (that might be over the line and into Windows territory) but, here I go . . . Of those user on this mailing list that manage Samba installs for various clients/customers, what are your most used GPO policies you have put into place for AD management? I ask because, when you venture over into Windows world and start reading posted articles about their
2009 May 26
2
[How-To?] Using Syslinux AltMBR + TrueCrypt System Encryption (RFE: swap drive ID's)
..., I was just copying what I found in: http://www.steve-oh.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/12/ubuntu-vista-dual-boot-full-encryption-with-truecrypt/ which spoke of going it under grub) by executing: :: dd if=/dev/hda of=/mnt/hda5/name_tc.mbr count=1 :: dd if=/dev/hda of=/mnt/hda5/name_tc.img count=8 bs=63b :: using fdisk, make hda1's boot flag active (and leave hda5's boot flag active, too!) About TC's boot loader: It's pretty 'brain dead' - it will only attempt to 'mount' partitions whose boot flag is active ... which would break using syslinux since normally the...
2025 Jun 02
1
Users unable to reset passwords
On Wed May 21 02:51:51 2025 Luis Peromarta via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > In 20 minutes. > > http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:start > On 21 May 2025 at 08:13 +0200, samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > > > > > > > > I will repeat this, I suggest you move away from slackware to Debian, > > if
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...outsl %ds:(%esi),(%dx) > 62f: 69 6e 74 5f 61 6c 69 imul $0x696c615f,0x74(%esi),%ebp > 636: 61 popa > - 637: 73 5f jae 698 <__FUNCTION__.20731+0x27> > - 639: 73 65 jae 6a0 <__FUNCTION__.20223> > - 63b: 74 73 je 6b0 <__FUNCTION__.20223+0x10> > + 637: 73 5f jae 698 <__FUNCTION__.20645+0x27> > + 639: 73 65 jae 6a0 <__FUNCTION__.20138> > + 63b: 74 73 je 6b0 <__FUNCTION__.20138+0x10> >...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the