search for: 6395

...for data. I use a gigabit switch for all VOIP and a regular 10/100Mbps switch for all data. This morning I saw this message a few times on the Asterisk command line. The lagged cause garbled phone calls. Is my network to slow? Or is there something else going on? Aug 9 09:40:21 NOTICE[6395]: chan_sip.c:9929 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'netlogic' is now TOO LAGGED! (1050ms / 1000ms) Aug 9 09:40:55 NOTICE[6395]: chan_sip.c:9923 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'netlogic' is now REACHABLE! (17ms / 1000ms) Aug 9 09:41:56 NOTICE[6395]: chan_sip.c:9929 handle_response_...

...i cannot get gluster to accept the file on disk as authoritative. any ideas how to fix this Using gluster 3.12.6 Thanks Russell Wecker IT Director Southern Asia-Pacific Division San Miguel II Bypass Silang, Silang, Cavite 4118 Philippines Phone: +63 46 414 4000 x 5210 Cell: +63 917 595 6395 URL: [ http://ssd.adventist.asia/ | http://ssd.adventist.asia ] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180220/155c4b04/attachment.html>

...c:9983:glusterd_max_opversion_use_rsp_dict] 0-management: Maximum supported op-version not set in destination dictionary Russell Wecker IT Director Southern Asia-Pacific Division San Miguel II Bypass Silang, Silang, Cavite 4118 Philippines Phone: +63 46 414 4000 x 5210 Cell: +63 917 595 6395 URL: [ http://ssd.adventist.asia/ | http://ssd.adventist.asia ] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180219/9c8a32a9/attachment.html>

...the only difference being the trusted.afr.dirty item in found2 which in not in found3. Any help would be appreciated. Russell Wecker IT Director Southern Asia-Pacific Division San Miguel II Bypass Silang, Silang, Cavite 4118 Philippines Phone: +63 46 414 4000 x 5210 Cell: +63 917 595 6395 URL: [ http://ssd.adventist.asia/ | http://ssd.adventist.asia ] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180220/80a9844a/attachment.html>

...nt: Maximum supported > op-version not set in destination dictionary > > > > > Russell Wecker > IT Director > Southern Asia-Pacific Division > San Miguel II > Bypass Silang, Silang, Cavite > 4118 Philippines > Phone: +63 46 414 4000 x 5210 > Cell: +63 917 595 6395 > URL: http://ssd.adventist.asia > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed.....

...])[3370,3371:18 [0])[3390,3394:19 [0]) [3394,3395:20 [0])[3642,3646:21 [0])[3646,3647:22 [0])[3666,3670:23 [0]) [3670,3671:24 [0])[3942,3946:25 [0])[3946,3947:26 [0])[3966,3970:27 [0]) [3970,3971:28 [0])[6098,6102:29 [0])[6102,6103:30 [0])[6126,6130:31 [0]) [6130,6131:32 [0])[6390,6394:33 [0])[6394,6395:34 [0])[6418,6422:35 [0]) [6422,6423:36 [0])[6714,6718:37 [0])[6718,6719:38 [0])[6742,6746:39 [0]) [6746,6747:40 [0])[7434,7438:41 [0])[7438,7439:42 [0])[7462,7466:43 [0]) [7466,7467:44 [0])[8446,8450:45 [0])[8450,8451:46 [0])[8474,8478:47 [0]) [8478,8479:48 [0])[8710,8714:49 [0])[8714,8715:50 [0])...

Hello: I am new to the list. I am trying to set up asterisk with voicepulse. I have a voicepulse username + password, and SIP DID. When I login to voicepulse, I have this under my devices tab: Devices *Login:* Sysxxxxxxx *Password:* xxxxxxxxxx *Context:* VPWS *Connects to:* gw5.voicepulse.com My question is: Do I need a 2.4.x kernel? Currently I am running Debian/stable stock 2.2.x ? Has

Full_Name: Sheila Bryant Version: 1.1.1 OS: Solaris 2.6 Submission from: (NULL) (134.225.16.2) During the 'make' process I get the following: String found where operator expected at /export/bors/bors-01/sws96srb/R-1.1.1/etc/Rdconvlib.pl line 781, near "("</TABLE>\n"" (Missing operator before "</TABLE>\n"?) Bare word found where operator

Dear all, When I compared the performance of some application on both a Xen domU and a standard linux machine (where domU runs on a similar physical mahine), I notice the application runs faster on the domU than on the physical machine. Instrumenting the application code shows the application spends more time on popen() calls on domU than on the physical machine. I wonder if xenlinux does some

...mov %r13,%rsi > 6387: 4c 89 e7 mov %r12,%rdi > 638a: e8 86 c7 ff ff callq 2b15 <get_first_obj_offset> > 638f: 41 89 c5 mov %eax,%r13d > 6392: 4c 89 f0 mov %r14,%rax > 6395: 48 c1 e8 03 shr $0x3,%rax > 6399: 8a 04 18 mov (%rax,%rbx,1),%al > 639c: 84 c0 test %al,%al > 639e: 0f 85 f2 02 00 00 jne 6696 <zs_compact+0x54b> > 63a4: 41 8b 44 24 78...

...mov %r13,%rsi > 6387: 4c 89 e7 mov %r12,%rdi > 638a: e8 86 c7 ff ff callq 2b15 <get_first_obj_offset> > 638f: 41 89 c5 mov %eax,%r13d > 6392: 4c 89 f0 mov %r14,%rax > 6395: 48 c1 e8 03 shr $0x3,%rax > 6399: 8a 04 18 mov (%rax,%rbx,1),%al > 639c: 84 c0 test %al,%al > 639e: 0f 85 f2 02 00 00 jne 6696 <zs_compact+0x54b> > 63a4: 41 8b 44 24 78...

Hi Sergey, On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:59:09PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello Minchan, > > -next 4.7.0-rc3-next-20160614 > > > [ 315.146533] kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled > [ 315.146538] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access > [ 315.146546] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN > [ 315.146576] Modules

Hi Sergey, On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:59:09PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello Minchan, > > -next 4.7.0-rc3-next-20160614 > > > [ 315.146533] kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled > [ 315.146538] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access > [ 315.146546] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN > [ 315.146576] Modules

...4c 89 ee mov %r13,%rsi 6387: 4c 89 e7 mov %r12,%rdi 638a: e8 86 c7 ff ff callq 2b15 <get_first_obj_offset> 638f: 41 89 c5 mov %eax,%r13d 6392: 4c 89 f0 mov %r14,%rax 6395: 48 c1 e8 03 shr $0x3,%rax 6399: 8a 04 18 mov (%rax,%rbx,1),%al 639c: 84 c0 test %al,%al 639e: 0f 85 f2 02 00 00 jne 6696 <zs_compact+0x54b> 63a4: 41 8b 44 24 78 mov 0x78(%r...

...-0.025 2 4460 592 592 0.1125 0.7875 -0.025 2 4667 593 593 0.1125 0.8125 -0.025 2 5212 594 594 0.1125 0.8375 -0.025 2 5266 595 595 0.1125 0.8625 -0.025 2 4860 596 596 0.1125 0.8875 -0.025 2 5627 597 597 0.1125 0.9125 -0.025 2 6395 598 598 0.1125 0.9375 -0.025 2 7163 599 599 0.1125 0.9625 -0.025 2 7931 600 600 0.1125 0.9875 -0.025 2 8699 601 601 0.1125 1.0125 -0.025 2 9467 602 602 0.1125 1.0375 -0.025 2 8645 603 603 0.1125 1.0625 -0.025 2 7823 604 604 0.1125...

...: disp: 0d14: 00000000 [ 3746.711385] perf: interrupt took too long (4029 > 3930), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 49500 [ 4000.803045] perf: interrupt took too long (5048 > 5036), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 39600 [ 4425.233164] perf: interrupt took too long (6395 > 6310), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 31200 [19302.422899] audit: type=1130 audit(1565996458.029:117): pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='unit=shadow comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success'...

...e:6021: test -s conftest configure:6024: $? = 0 configure:6036: result: yes configure:6124: checking for gethostbyname configure:6211: result: no configure:6220: checking for gethostbyname in -lnsl configure:6281: result: yes configure:6299: checking for connect configure:6386: result: no configure:6395: checking for connect in -lsocket configure:6456: result: yes configure:6474: checking for inet_aton configure:6531: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lsocket -lnsl >&5 Undefined first referenced symbol in file inet_aton /var/tmp//ccMQGaUg.o ld: fatal...