Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "62b600f8".
2013 Jun 28
0
[LLVMdev] [LNT] Question about results reliability in LNT infrustructure
On 28 June 2013 14:06, David Tweed <david.tweed at arm.com> wrote:
> That's a viewpoint; another one is that statisticians might well have very
> good reasons why they spend so long coming up with statistical tests in
> order to create the most powerful tests so they can deal with marginal
> quantities of data.
>
87.35% of all statistics are made up, 55.12% of them could
2013 Jun 28
2
[LLVMdev] [LNT] Question about results reliability in LNT infrustructure
...___
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130628/62b600f8/attachment.html>
2013 Jun 27
7
[LLVMdev] [LNT] Question about results reliability in LNT infrustructure
There are a few things we have looked at with LNT runs, so I will share the insights we have had so far. A lot of the problems we have are artificially created by our test protocols instead of the compiler changes themselves. I have been doing a lot of large sample runs of single benchmarks to characterize them better. Some key points:
1) Some benchmarks are bi-modal or multi-modal, single