Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "62863".
Did you mean:
6263
2019 Feb 28
3
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...,994,464
65.551%
2
35,478,867
17.228%
3
15,658,999
7.604%
4
8,045,798
3.907%
5
4,540,451
2.205%
6
2,634,179
1.279%
7
1,608,599
0.781%
8
1,007,705
0.489%
9
643,471
0.312%
10
418,645
0.203%
11
279816
0.136%
12
189733
0.092%
13
129686
0.063%
14
90484
0.044%
15
62863
0.031%
16
43584
0.021%
17
31240
0.015%
18
22180
0.011%
19
15850
0.008%
20
11266
0.005%
21
8171
0.004%
22
5900
0.003%
23
4379
0.002%
24
3167
0.002%
25
2316
0.001%
26
1681
0.001%
27
1185
0.001%
28
901
0.000%
29
638
0.000%
30
465
0.000%
31
367
0.000%
3...
2019 Feb 27
4
Making LLD PDB generation faster
This could be ICF. There were lots of issues with ICF on ARM64, but they
are not inherently ARM64-specific, they just come up there more often. See
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56986 which fixes that.
Easiest thing is always to profile or add /time to see what's slow.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 6:30 AM Leonardo Santagada <santagada at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Anyone would know why lld takes