search for: 62359c2

...es it too... Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <nouveau at spliet.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c index eef09bf..62359c2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c @@ -620,6 +620,12 @@ gf100_ram_train_init(struct nvkm_ram *ram) static int gf100_ram_init(struct nvkm_ram *base) { + struct nvkm_subdev *subdev = &base->fb->subdev; +...

...: Roy Spliet <nouveau at spliet.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c index 62359c2..a469719 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c @@ -556,22 +556,49 @@ gf100_ram_train_init_0(struct nvkm_ram *ram, struct gt215_ram_train *train) struct nvkm_device *device = subdev->device; int i, j; - if ((tr...

No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern upload routines from GK104+ now shared with GT215+ - Timing calculation for Fermi - GDDR5 MR calculation from VBIOS timing table v1.0. Also useful for that pesky GT 240. - A routine to translate a VBIOS init

Two patches went missing as a result of PEBCAK. No v2 marks as nothing changed really. Just resending for easier enforcement of patch order in other people's trees. Sorry for the noise. Original message: No, no, these will not implement Fermi reclocking. This set of patches contains some of the preparatory work that I deem stable enough to move upstream. Notable changes - Training pattern