search for: 621straat0918

...indoze machines and do > it for free. That is what many hackers do. Those crackers who build these botnets are the ones who rent out botnet time to people who just was to get the work done. There is a large market in botnet time. > > Is this safe enough ? > > wac4140SoeTer'#621strAAt0918;@@ > > Yes, it is.

...s are the ones who rent out botnet >> time to people who just was to get the work done. There is a large >> market in botnet time. > > Surely its time for the Feds to arrest and change them ? > >> > Is this safe enough ? >> > >> > wac4140SoeTer'#621strAAt0918;@@ >> > >> > >> Yes, it is. > > Gee thanks. I'll use it for root on every server ;-) > I know this is joke. Yet (in a slim chance someone out there can follow it with seriousness) I would strongly suggest: Don't do it. Don't use anything as any sort of...

> On Feb 4, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > SSH as shipped on CentOS doesn?t allow 1,000 guesses per second, as this calculator assumes Hmm, just thought of a counterattack: If CentOS?s SSH currently allows 10 guesses per minute *per IP*, all you need to do to get 1,000 guesses per second is to rent time on a 6,000 machine botnet.

...rently allows 10 guesses per minute *per IP*, all you need to do to get 1,000 guesses per second is to rent time on a 6,000 machine botnet. Rent ? That costs money. Just crack open some Windoze machines and do it for free. That is what many hackers do. Is this safe enough ? wac4140SoeTer'#621strAAt0918;@@ Online Attack Scenario: (Assuming one thousand guesses per second) 7.26 hundred million trillion trillion trillion centuries Offline Fast Attack Scenario: (Assuming one hundred billion guesses per second) 7.26 trillion trillion trillion centuries Massive Cracking Array Scenario: (Assuming on...

...crackers who build these botnets are the ones who rent out botnet > time to people who just was to get the work done. There is a large > market in botnet time. Surely its time for the Feds to arrest and change them ? > > Is this safe enough ? > > > > wac4140SoeTer'#621strAAt0918;@@ > > > > > Yes, it is. Gee thanks. I'll use it for root on every server ;-) -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Je suis Charlie.

On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:41 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> > wac4140SoeTer'#621strAAt0918;@@ > > > > Gee thanks. I'll use it for root on every server ;-) > I know this is joke. Yet (in a slim chance someone out there can follow it > with seriousness) I would strongly suggest: > > Don't do it. Don't use anything as any sort of password which was ever...

On Thu, February 5, 2015 10:08 am, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:41 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> >> > wac4140SoeTer'#621strAAt0918;@@ >> > >> > Gee thanks. I'll use it for root on every server ;-) > >> I know this is joke. Yet (in a slim chance someone out there can follow >> it >> with seriousness) I would strongly suggest: >> >> Don't do it. Don't use anything as...