Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "62188a39".
2011 Apr 27
0
[LLVMdev] built-in longjmp and setjmp
There is no C standard to follow for these builtins. You are expecting them to behave as if they were the standard library calls. They are not equivalent and the naming similarity is an unfortunate historical artifact. Use the standard library functions instead.
-Jim
On Apr 27, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Akira Hatanaka wrote:
> I declared gi2 as "volatile" and I think gi2 is still
2011 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] built-in longjmp and setjmp
I declared gi2 as "volatile" and I think gi2 is still incremented once.
Here is a snippet of the code. Line 39 - 42 increments gi2.
According to the standard, shouldn't ++gi2 be executed twice regardless of
whether gi2 is volatile or not? Isn't the missing chain from EH_SJLJ_SETJMP
node to load/store nodes that access gi2 causing this problem (please see
attached file in my
2011 Apr 27
3
[LLVMdev] built-in longjmp and setjmp
...opers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110427/62188a39/attachment.html>