search for: 620cab3a

Reid raised this issue in a bug comment that I thought should be discussed on the mailing list: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=540 > I'm really not sure this is wise unless there is consensus that lli > should always be a multi-threaded program. Certainly, there's enough > problems with multi-threading that this could break many tests. I'd > like some

On May 13, 2005, at 20:30, Evan Jones wrote: > should LLVM always be capable of executing multithreaded programs? On a related note, I've updated my patch to fix the bug that I found in it, and I discussed on the mailing list last month. The details can be found in the bug: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=418 This is definitely *not* something that should go in before 1.5

...tegrated shortly after. Okay. Reid -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20050514/620cab3a/attachment.sig>