Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "62.568".
Did you mean:
26.568
2014 Sep 28
2
Re: Why libguestfs guest exist exceptionally?
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:33:53PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Which version of libguestfs is this? I think you'll have no hope of
>> #rpm -qa | grep libguestfs
>> libguestfs-1.20.8-1
2014 Sep 28
0
Re: Why libguestfs guest exist exceptionally?
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:04:11PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:33:53PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > Which version of libguestfs is this? I think you'll
2014 Sep 28
2
Re: Why libguestfs guest exist exceptionally?
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 11:04:11PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:33:53PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
2014 Sep 28
2
Re: Why libguestfs guest exist exceptionally?
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 04:30:37PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> HI,
>>
>> On a RHEL5 box, i tried to directly run guest which was issued by
>> libguestfs virt-xxx commands as below. But after some minutes, it
>> exited exceptionally.
>>
>> Does anyone also hit the